That is exactly the point,... the "contract" is not legal as the conditions were arrived at under severe duress, as is the case in extortion and/or blackmail.
(Either you accept the conditions Israel offers, or we'll murder the rest of you and just take it).
No matter what you think, fact is that the Oslo accords are legal and will be upheld until one side denounces it. That's how it goes .
Your last line is just an invention of you and far from the truth.
I suspect it is you that needs to look into contract law here as contracts that are not negotiated in good faith (for instance, fraud) or contracts made under duress (or force) or undue influence (unfair manipulation) are also not considered legally binding.
It doesn't matter who or what entity the contract is between.
Yes it does. There's a difference between national and international laws. Just like there are differences between national laws of different countries.
The only way a contract between states is void is because of the threat or use of force (war). May I remind you that , and I quote, "developing nations attempted to have economic coercion included as a form of force outlawed by article 52 of the Vienna Convention on Treaties. This position was rejected and has, therefore, not been applied to concession agreements." unquote.
Also, in order to prove that coercion (war) was applied, it must be proven. Just saying it is not enough.
Palestinians have the guts to fire rockets but not the guts to denounce a treaty????
Your best line of attack is not to try and rewrite contract law but rather to demonstrate that the accord was not signed under duress.
It's the one who claims it was made under duress who has to prove it. In this case he has to prove that Israel was going to start a war if the treaty wasn't signed. Your chances of doing so are nihil.
I have something to say guys,
Why are you speaking of contracts and crap? Maybe there was a contract between the Palestinians (forced) and the Israelis? That doesn't prove that Israel is an angel. Did Israel have a contract on the Sinai? Do they have a contract on the Golan Heights?
Sinai : Camp David accords signed by Sadat and Begin
Golan : UN Security Council Resolution 242 and 338
All two or more party "agreements" (written and verbal) are negotiated subject to Contract Law. If they do not conform, there is no legal obligation on either party.
Wrong. The Camp David accords fall under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Golan is a UN Council resolution.
I'm saying that even if there was a legal obligation on Israel like a UN resolution, they wouldn't care anyways. That's my point.
Israel fulfilled all UN Counsil resolutions, which are binding (Syria and Iran doesn't). UN General Assembly resolutions are poltical statements from different states and are not binding.
There is an International legal obligation, they don't give a fig for anyone or anything, that's what makes them a rogue state. When Saddam started acting like that, the US made up some **** and bull story about WMD and invaded, then hunted him down and hung him.
I think that it's time a few in Israel got a dose of the same medicine.
I wonder what news you read :
Iraq Official: Saddam Moved WMD to Syria. Bush was right after all.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with hatred of a rogue state that is responsible for virtually all the Islamic Global terrorism we see today.
Instead of claiming that in almost every other post of you, you'd better come up with some facts.
Give me the link with Boko Haram (Nigeria), Abu Sayyaf Group (Philippines), Al-Itihaad al-Islamiya, Al-Shabaab (Somalia), Ansar al-Islam (Iraq), Caucasus Emirate (Chechnya),Great Eastern Islamic Raiders' Front (Turkey) (and many many more) and Israel.
LIAR. Israel has killed 90,785 killed by their own admission
, http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/casualtiestotal.html
No doubt this figure is seriously understated.
It is estimated that there are 5 million Palestinian refugees today as a result of the Israelis. I'd say that for a pissant state smaller than some farms, you are punching well above your weight in the Ethnic cleansing race. The UN and virtually every other humanitarian aid agency in the world agrees.
Nowhere in the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees states that descendants of refugees are refugees themselves. The UNHCR did this
only for the Palestinians in violation of UN regulations.
Also, a lot of the, so called, refugees left voluntarily because the Arabs asked them to leave and come back once the jews were driven into the sea.
How many Palestinian refugees are there?
The first Gulf War was because Iraq invaded Kuwait...where was the coalition support for Iran when they invaded them...Oh...wait...the US sold BILLIONS in arms to the Iraqis to fight against the "Islamist" Iranians...Two short years after that war the very weapons we sold to the Iraqis were used first against the Kuwaitis and then against the coalition during Desert Storm.
You are misinformed. Iraq's weapons were almost all from Russia.
Figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute - SIPRI
The second Gulf War was prosecuted on extremely shoddy or even false intelligence. There was no connection between Iraq and the radical Muslems, and the WMD threat was grossly over estimated or even falsified to make Iraq out as much bigger threat than they actually were. To this day, the huge stockpiles we were expected to find in Iraq have not materialized...and trust me...we looked.
Of course you couldn't find them. Sadam moved them to Syria a few months before you entered the country.
Radical Muslems didn't enter Iraq until AFTER we went there...not before.
Never heard of Ansar al-Islam? Their bases were bombed in the early days of Operation Iraqi Freedom.
easy up . The territory of Arab countries are so wildly,it ocuppy the north party of Africa and some areas of west Asia. I think the Arabs don't care of the little land who capture by Israelis。
Arabs are muslims and (radical) muslims do care about the land on wich Israel is founded. To them it is muslim land, just as Spain and some Balkan countries. To them non-muslims are not allowed to rule over muslim land.
I thought you could just occupy and stile others lands but it seems you can also say lie very well.
That's because you don't know what the truth is.
