Ohio State's drop out of the top ten was, in my opinion, pretty generous also given how they didn't show up against USC, and they're far enough out that they need to win out the rest of their games AND rely on several teams to lose once, some twice, to get a shot. USC, Florida and Oklahoma had their shots, only OU could really walk away from their game with their heads held high because at least the lost to a team who wasn't a double digit favorite. And even though this topic isn't about Florida, I'm lashing out at that pick too, moving up seven spots, leap frogging two undefeated teams? Where my BS flag? Consider this, if Texas Tech, Oklahoma State, BYU, USC and Texas all finish the season with no more losses it will most likely be USC and Texas in the title game, hardly seems fair that a team who has already proven on the field that they can be defeated should get a chance to play for a title over teams that have gone out and got the job done every saturday for three months. Ohio State may only have one loss but they don't exactly have any impressive wins, my D-1AA school beat Youngstown St. 40-7 the week after Ohio State beat them 43-0.
I guess my whole point here is teams who have already loss have shown themselves to be vulnerable, infallible, and beatable, the team who are undefeated have gone out there and taken care of business every week. Given the lack of a playoff system I think it's deplorable that so many one-loss teams are in the top 10 ahead of undefeated teams in the top 10.