Those "opinions" are those of people with infinitesimally more knowledge of the subject than you VD and unfortunately a denial by you means nothing as has been noted by others here, you would deny your own existence if it suited your story.
Again another opinion.
3000 years ago there were no Jews there either it was inhabited by the ancestors of today's Palestinians the Canaanites. The Jews at this time were in Egypt and according to their own "alleged" history only arrived in the area we call Palestine about 1800BCE by which time the Canaanites ancestors had lived in the area for about 90,000 years. The Jews were merely a "blink in the eye of time", having no historic connection to the area within the context of this debate.
Well, if we dig far enough we all end up as brothers and sisters somewhere in southern Africa. The search for "who was first" is ridiculous. What we must search for is who had the first working society in that region. The Jews of today still speak Hebrew (a Canaanite dialect) that dates back to the 10th century BCE (
Most ancient Hebrew biblical inscription deciphered), the period of King David's reign. The evidence was found on a pottery shard discovered in the Elah valley nearby present day Jerusalem. Their religion dates back to 600 BCE, when the Torah was written. They had their first kindom (same language - same religion) in the 1st and 2nd century BCE. It was called
Israel in the First Book of Maccabees. There also was a Kingdom of
Israel in the 10th century BCE (same language - different religion). The first written evidence of the Arabic language are the Hasaean inscriptions in eastern Saudi Arabia, from the 8th century BCE. Two centuries later than Hebrew and not even in the region we are talking about. Their religion only started in the 7th century. There never was a society that spoke Arabic and had as religion Islam in the region Palestine. (the PA is not yet an official state).
Israeli archeologists have been excavating under their supposed "Temple on the Mount" and in 60 years have found no credible evidence of a "Jewish" kingdom founded there, they have found Byzantine relics, cisterns walls, and other earlier artifacts but not a single thing that supports the story that this place ever belonged to or was built by any Jewish "Kingdom" as such. In view of past Jewish mythology, they will grab hold of the very slightest possible clue to do so.
Around 930 BC a state named Judah was founded. The people living in that state became known as the Jews.
"The life and times of Jeremiah have been vividly illustrated by the discovery in 1935 by J.L. Starkey of eighteen ostraca inscribed in Hebrew (using the old Hebrew or Phoenician script, rather than the square Aramaic script). The documents were uncovered in the guard room and adjoining outer gate of the city of Lachish (Tell ed-Duweir), an ancient fortress of Judah, some twenty-five mmiles southwest of Jerusalem. Three additional ostraca (raising the total found to twenty-one), were discovered in the last excavation campaign at Lachish in 1938."
First Evidence of a Cult in Judah at Time of King David
Most significant archeological digs can find all manner of evidence to support their ideas within a few years. If the Israeli official view is so doubtful, after at least 150 years of multinational Archeological work in this small area, I'd say that even this report is seriously skewed in support Jewish mythology.
Well, you can doubt about evidence of a former Jewish state, there is absolute no doubt that there never has been a Palestinian state.
In fact, Palestinians called themselves Palestinians because it was common known among the Christian world, not the local ME.
Have you ever wondered why we call that place Palestine? Because the Christian world grew up with it. Jesus lived in Palestine, in fact the Romans called it Syria Palestine. So for hundreds of years the Christian world, the world we live in, called that place Palestine. After WWI the International community, in fact the Christian world, gave the British a mandate over Palestine. But to the local population and in the times of the Ottoman Empire there was no Palestine. It was called Damascus Eyalet (1517–1864) or Eyalet of Syria (after 1864). There were further divisions later on but none bare the name Palestine. So the local population mostly called themselves Syrians. When the fighting began between the Jews and the Arabs, most of the Arabs called themselves Syrians because the name Palestine was not familiar to them. It was in fact the European Jews who immigrated who called themselves Palestinians, because that was the name of the region commonly named in Europe. Arafat saw the political potential of naming themselves Palestinians because this would link them as the original population. Palestine - Palestinians is more logic than the Palestine - Syrians or Arabs (like they called themselves). The name change was political and certainly not historical.
The first thing to hit my eye was the title of the video you posted, which supports exactly what I've been saying.
I also could be part of the wreck of the Hesperus, it could be part of any of thousands of old buildings in the area. It might have been part of a famous Canaanite ***** house. So far after 150 years of trying there is still no definitive proof, as admitted by your own government.
Nothing disproves the statement put out by your own Government. "There is no proof of any Jewish connection. that's pretty poor odds for a society who claims to have led a "great civilisation" in the area.
And in case of a Palestinian connection it certainly
COULD NOT BE.
First of all,there is no connection between the canaanites or phillistins to today's fakestiniains,and you can't prove otherwise,
read the rest.
The video was just a thing i picked up from a quick search in google.
If you are really into it,you should come here for yourself and see.
Stop avoiding parts of my comments .
That's what they do all the time. Every evidence you give to them they ignore. And when it hits hard they stay away for a couple of days and then come back with the same BS.
DNA shows your lie for what it is, and just as interestingly it shows most of todays Ashkenazi Jews to be predominantly Khazars from southern Turkey having virtually no connection with the middle east at all. Only Zionist research shows differently. (Who would have guessed)?
Read The Khazar Empire and its Heritage
By Arthur Koestler (A Jewish Researcher)
First the book's name is "The Thirteenth Tribe: The Khazar Empire and Its Heritage" and it is based on the
theory that European Jews, Ashkenazi Jews from Europe, are not descendants of Abraham but rather are the remnants of a tribe, the Khazars, that converted to Judaism in the Eighth Century.
This is what a reader said about it:
Since the publication of The Thirteenth Tribe, additional scholarship from anthropologists, historians, and geneticists have shown the conclusions of the author to be invalid.
Try something better Seno, it gets boring.
I would no more visit your filthy rogue state than I would a Nazi concentration Camp or some third world dictatorship like Zimbabwe.
You don't know what you are missing.
I ignore much of what you post because it is all material that has been dealt with on this forum many times. What you fail to realise is that you have just arrived, some of us have been answering idiots like you for years.
If you keep ignoring the facts you will never know the truth.
