So it is your contention that it is some how fairer when shooting fish in a barrel that you notify them beforehand?
Gaza is roughly 40km long and between 6 and 12km wide approximately 360km2 and houses 1.7 million people, the largest city in this country is 1.5 million and 483km2 that equates to 2,700 people per km2
So tell me were are these people going to go in area thanks to the magnanimous Israeli gesture?
That's the crappiest response I have ever seen from you. I did ask folk to cut the b/s. Obviously you are scraping the bottom of your fish barrel.
My contention, since you need to ask, is that Israel always strives to give civilians warning of targetted buildings etc. I remind you that referring to Arabs as 'fish in a barrel' is inappropriate. They are not fish at all and the Israelis care for them more than Hamas does in that respect.
Your attempt at deflection cuts no ice with me, I lived through the Nazi blitzkreig on East London which was packed tight with civilians. Our leaders cared enough for us to provide shelter and refuge, even though the Nazis gave no warning whatsoever. To move from a targetted building into others is not impossible. Gaza has plenty of money-making tunnels and there is no reason why Anderson shelters should be an impossibility .
Hamas should protect its civilians; why does it not?
For Hamas it makes good publicity.
On the other hand, the Israelis, hit by hundreds of rockets every day, take steps to defend its people.
Otherwise, thousands upon thousands of Israeli victims would be stacked up against the 160 Arab casualties. This 160 was accidental - the rockets raining in on Israel were hell bent upon intentional genocide - civilians deliberately targetted for maximum impact.
I have noted that you have studiously tried to deflect the intended strike rate :- Thousands upon thousands of Israelis on one side - 160 unintentional Arabs on the other.
As far as size is concerned, you now understand that Israel is a mere slip of space defending itself against the enormous Goliath of Arabia which has as much land, as much space as they would ever need.
EDIT.
MONTY B - I wish to withdraw the word 'crappiest' from my opening sentence. Apologies - I have seen worse. So how about 'weakest'.
Furthermore, I was saving that line especially for you when referring to the recent Kiwis v. England rugby bunfight.
Furthermore - Happy Christmas.