Shame they didn't bother to get the story right to start with, instead of keep changing it. First of all a woman was shot acting a human shield, now they say she wasn't acting as a sheild, but just got caught in the crossfire.
It was just the same with the botched hostage rescue, same squad.
They also say he didn't surrender but wasn't armed, does this make sense? Presumably he didn't put his hands up so they shot him? Seems to me there was not a serious attempt to take him alive. Whilst I realise this doesn't seem important to the gung ho squad, it could still be technically illegal. It's not worth giving these terrorists any moral ammunition. Remember his family saw what happened and will subsequently report it, and presumably it is all recorded.
The rapid disposal of the body, combined with the non release of pictures also encourages the conspiracy theorists. An impersonator is all it would take for the most infamous 'resurrection' for 2000 years!