Urbanboy said:
are you trying to emphasize that ethenic tatar groups are superior than the average han group??
Urbanboy, in all honesty you might be fishing for bigotry/racism against the Chinese people where there is none. I am not trying to emphasize the Manchus as being anything other than what they were: A semi-barbaric band of thugs that came to conquer. Opportunists that jumped at the chance when the Ming started self-destructing. Sure they'd been trying for years, but that is nothing new to China. The threat was ALWAYS in the north.
The Manchus were ultimately absorbed by the China anyways, just like so many before them. The Manchus had already mostly adopted Chinese culture as their own well before they even began their systematic conquest of China. They went to greater lengths than anyone before them to preserve their distinct identity. In the process, they replaced the primary spoken language with a much changed version of their native language. The world knows it as Mandarin Chinese. All the rest: their laws and prohibitions against mixing ethnic Manchu with ethnic Han Chinese and other such things only delayed the inevitable. Such laws only became more and more pointless as time passed. Mission failed, they became Chinese anyways. And its the same China. The delusions of superiority of Mandarin/Manchu roots still exists today but its foolishness is more evident all the time. But nobody needs to delude themselves into believing that they were alwasy Chinese. The most definitely weren't. Not anymore than Ghengis Khan was Han Chinese.
Their belief in their own racial superiority is silly, of course. The harsh environment of Siberia, Mongolia and Manchuia to a lesser degree. We're looking at a bitter northern climate and land that makes hard men. Take any group of human beings and force them to survive in the same region and you get the same effect: A group of people that are harder than steel.
There are things about Chinese culture that I will never fully comprehend but that will not stop me from trying anyway. I do not know Chinese history as well as most Chinese, most likely. I can imagine that is certainly the case, but you should consider that in the USA, very little of Chinese history is ever bothered with. The majority of Americans have no concept of what "Han Chinese" might be, for instance. Hardly any of them have any understanding of what the whole Taiwan business is all about. Many Americans are entirely unaware that the island is "officially" a part of China. When the controversy heats up (as it always seems to do), if they manage to even notice at all, they are often surprised that what they always think of as an independent country (Taiwan) is the mysterious source of Chinese anger. That's if they even bother thinking about it at all. "Some fight in some remote corner of the world, why do I care?" Most would be very hard pressed to find Taiwan on a map. Let's be honest, the controversy over Taiwan is confusing as hell. I think we're improving somewhat on American ignorance, but it is quite silly that so many Americans give so little thought to the outside world.
For my part, I find it frustrating that the only things about China that ever seem to get discussed are such things as Taiwan, Tibet, Tianamen Square, and the border wars with Vietnam, India and the Soviet Union. Controversies. But just watch: If a topic is started on something like the grand fleet of the Ming Dynasty, hardly anyone will bother with it. Much of the forum knows far too little about it.
The sufferings of China in World War II seems to seems to be a worthwhile subject on the surface. And yet, it leads to nothing good ... just a hostile rehashing of Japan's attrocities against China. Japan seems determined to focus all attention on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and how terrible the United States was to drop the Atom Bomb on them. They did
far worse to China, Korea, the Phillipines and all of the long list of victimized countries. Their greatest determination as a nation is to deny that any of it ever happened. Japan's determination in this regard leads right into flame wars as well. And that too becomes a pointless discussion. You're never going to wake someone up until they are willing to let you wake them.
You could have a wonderful discussion about the oldest semi-continuous nation on the planet. The glorious past of China is hardly bothered with on this forum. The long history of what could be compared to a completely unified Europe lasting well over 2000 years (fading an reemerging as one Dynasty dies and another rises from the chaos to eventually takes its place.) We Westerners are quite familiar with Egypt following the same pattern, but China is the pattern of Egypt on so much bigger of a scale that it absolutely blows your mind. On top of all that, the Egypt of that pattern died out a long long time ago. China is still going strong with no hint of ever stopping. The oldest nation in the world, if I am not mistaken. Westerners haven't a clue for the most part.
But all everyone ever wants to talk about is Taiwan, Taiwan, Taiwan. Why?