A Can of Man
Je suis aware
Perhaps, but it would be misleading to mention one and not the other.
Well this one is easy, the minute you put something in a record-able form is the minute you can expect it to eventually enter the public domain.
I am on the whole a little concerned with the Wikileaks thing, on one hand I am a firm believer in public knowing what is being done in "our" name but if that information is endangering people (and as yet there is nothing to say that it is) then it needs to be withheld until such times as it wont endanger them.
Whaaa??... He has,... and if you had made the slightest attempt to read and understand what is going on, you would have known that. Maybe it's not reported in the US, but there are plenty of Australian politicians and military leaders pulling their hair out if you are to believe the press, and I have no doubt the same is the case in the UK and other places. I'm absolutely sure that he merely released what he has been given, and made no attempt to focus on any one country.seno, I have NEVER doubted that Assange is anti American. All he has released is American documents, but please don't tell me that he has not recieved anything from people from other countires.
I'd say it was done because, It was time that proof was shown to support what most of the world was already aware of, we are being lied to on a grand scale, and it is costing trillions of dollars, not to mention thousands of lives of both our Servicemen and the nationals in the countries concerned. I think that might be a good start as to why this type of thing is needed every now and then. In Australia, we call it "Keeping the bastards honest".I question why? I return to what I said before.
Like the hundreds of totally innocent persons who were incarcerated and tortured in Gitmo and otherplaces I suppose, sold out by their own countrymen (and others) for cash incentives put up by your Government, and more to the point, even when this was discovered, virtually none of them were released.Assange should realize that in taking on the US government he has made himself a target.
In America we have the benefit of congressional oversight. I do not believe that the general public needs to know EVERYTHING that the government is doing. We have to trust the system. If we cannot, then it should be changed. I realize how this sounds but it is a VERY FINE LINE that we tread and determining what should be released is NEVER easy.
So then you trust your government completely?
The fact is whether we (individually) like it or not these people act in our name and using our financing, we put them in the position to do this therefore we have every right to know what they are up to and lets be honest here had the documents leaked been in line with what we were told by these people there would be no issues.
I have to agree with Seno here, while the majority of the documents are American I have read Australian, New Zealand and a host of other nations ones as well.
Could you supply some examples?
As the Wikileaks website lists no Australian or New Zealand documents leaked. The site also does not list any United States leaked documents mentioning either Australia or New Zealand. Could mean the Australian an New Zealand governments are so truthful that Wikileaks could find nothing newsworthy to reveal.![]()
I find it interesting that he is having legal troubles with Sweden, not the USA. I stand by my statement that he is Anti American and will do anything he thinks will undermine the USA.Whaaa??... He has,... and if you had made the slightest attempt to read and understand what is going on, you would have known that. Maybe it's not reported in the US, but there are plenty of Australian politicians and military leaders pulling their hair out if you are to believe the press, and I have no doubt the same is the case in the UK and other places. I'm absolutely sure that he merely released what he has been given, and made no attempt to focus on any one country.
If we are being lied to then the media is certainly aiding and abetting. I think that it is good that we have taken the fight to the insurgents. We are combating them on their turf and the turf of their supporters. Better there than here.I'd say it was done because, It was time that proof was shown to support what most of the world was already aware of, we are being lied to on a grand scale, and it is costing trillions of dollars, not to mention thousands of lives of both our Servicemen and the nationals in the countries concerned. I think that might be a good start as to why this type of thing is needed every now and then. In Australia, we call it "Keeping the bastards honest".
They were never released because their countries wouldn't take them back. Admit it, these guys were living better in US prison than they would at home. If you have a source proving that the insurgents were tortured please provide it. The US Army currently uses the Human Intelligence Collector Operations FM 2-22.3. This was last updated in 2006 and President Obama has ordered a review. Still pending.Like the hundreds of totally innocent persons who were incarcerated and tortured in Gitmo and otherplaces I suppose, sold out by their own countrymen (and others) for cash incentives put up by your Government, and more to the point, even when this was discovered, virtually none of them were released.
Never brought morality into it. You did.The USA has a bloody long way to go before they can start preaching morality to the likes of Assange.
OK I'll adress that now. It seems that Manning was not only a deeply troubled individual, but he was also desperate for attention. This is his way to get his 15 minutes. At the conclusion of his military trial, if he is found guilty, he should be sentenced to the maximum punishment. If it was discovered that the information he released led to the death or deaths of people who were helping us, then he should be tried for accessory to murder.Once again, you neglect to say anything about the person(s) who actually stole the information. Patriotism is admirable (in certain circumstances), but self centred jingoism is not.
I admit to being patriotic, nothing more.
Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all others because you were born in it.
George Bernard Shaw
It is lamentable, that to be a good patriot one must become the enemy of the rest of mankind.
Voltaire
Dear Interpol:
As a longtime feminist activist, I have been overjoyed to discover your new commitment to engaging in global manhunts to arrest and prosecute men who behave like narcissistic jerks to women they are dating.
I see that Julian Assange is accused of having consensual sex with two women, in one case using a condom that broke. I understand, from the alleged victims' complaints to the media, that Assange is also accused of texting and tweeting in the taxi on the way to one of the women's apartments while on a date, and, disgustingly enough, 'reading stories about himself online' in the cab.
Both alleged victims are also upset that he began dating a second woman while still being in a relationship with the first. (Of course, as a feminist, I am also pleased that the alleged victims are using feminist-inspired rhetoric and law to assuage what appears to be personal injured feelings. That's what our brave suffragette foremothers intended!).
Thank you again, Interpol. I know you will now prioritize the global manhunt for 1.3 million guys I have heard similar complaints about personally in the US alone -- there is an entire fraternity at the University of Texas you need to arrest immediately. I also have firsthand information that John Smith in Providence, Rhode Island, went to a stag party -- with strippers! -- that his girlfriend wanted him to skip, and that Mark Levinson in Corvallis, Oregon, did not notice that his girlfriend got a really cute new haircut -- even though it was THREE INCHES SHORTER.
Terrorists. Go get 'em, Interpol!
Yours gratefully,
Naomi Wolf
Same could be said about South Africa. People from all over Africa fled to South Africa prefering Apartied to thier own cesspool dictatorship.If everything is so bad here in America, why do a lot of people emigrate here?
If everything is so bad here in America, why do a lot of people emigrate here? Why do we have such a problem with illeagal immigration? I believe that the standards of living are better here than in their home countries. America is still the land of opportunity. America is by no means perfect but we still represent a lot of ideals that people want to emulate.
It is true I was born here, but America has provided me with many opportunities, as long as I am willing to work hard.
The extremists attacked our way of life because they resent us. When we defend our interests we are called empire builders, racists and a bunch of other things. Just tired of the double standards.
While it is important for democracy to have transparency, our enemies will continue to use that against us. Wikileaks, in theory, is a watchdog group. Assange seems to be set on releasing information just because he can, without regard for the consequences. Responsible people would have considered the consequences of their actions. Assange does not care and blasts everything out to everyone and let the chips fall where they may.
But of course, just as anyone who criticises Israel, regardless of the fact that they are correct is an "Anti Semite", like many of the persons Assange is uncovering , you seem determined to divert the blame from your own country or citizens. Assange is the owner of a website publishing leaked documents, no different to any other form of media be it newspaper, or TV or whatever, and you still seem to neglect the fact that most, if not all of the information was stolen by a US citizen.I find it interesting that he is having legal troubles with Sweden, not the USA. I stand by my statement that he is Anti American and will do anything he thinks will undermine the USA.
Once again you won't look at the root cause but attribute the blame to others. The Media were reporting what they are told, the actual lies are being diseminated by the Government and their agencies.If we are being lied to then the media is certainly aiding and abetting. I think that it is good that we have taken the fight to the insurgents. We are combating them on their turf and the turf of their supporters. Better there than here.
Their countries were not ever consulted when they were removed, how come they are consulted about their return? In fact, in most cases their respective countries were not even aware that they had ever been removed from that country.They were never released because their countries wouldn't take them back. Admit it, these guys were living better in US prison than they would at home. If you have a source proving that the insurgents were tortured please provide it. The US Army currently uses the Human Intelligence Collector Operations FM 2-22.3. This was last updated in 2006 and President Obama has ordered a review. Still pending.
CIA Torture in Iraq | |
The whole argument is based on morality, and you well know it, that is the whole point of WikileaksNever brought morality into it. You did.
That does not hold water. If, as you allege, Manning was such a deeply troubled individual, why was he left in such a sensitive job? I would say that this is no more than another typical attempted cover up to discredit him.OK I'll adress that now. It seems that Manning was not only a deeply troubled individual, but he was also desperate for attention. This is his way to get his 15 minutes. At the conclusion of his military trial, if he is found guilty, he should be sentenced to the maximum punishment. If it was discovered that the information he released led to the death or deaths of people who were helping us, then he should be tried for accessory to murder.
Take a look at some of the rubbish you have presented here. e.g. "US not torturing insurgents" I don't have to demonstrate that you are a jingoist, you are doing a far better job than I ever could, it's not "name calling", merely an honest statement of fact.You say I am a self centered jingoist. Name calling should be left on the playground. I admit to being patriotic, nothing more.
Yes releasing information is what these groups do. However, I fell that Assange wants to consider himself a journalist (Conveniently hiding behind our 1st Ammendment) but what he has done is dangerous as well as irresponsible. I fear that in his rush to bash the US government he failed to adequately consider the consequences of his actions. He has placed the lives of US and coalition soldiers at risk, he has placed the lives of the Iraqi and Afghani people who are helping us at risk as well. Responsible journalists would have vetted the information and at least redacted names, tribes, towns that type of thing in order to prevent reprisals against them.
If everything is so bad here in America, why do a lot of people emigrate here? Why do we have such a problem with illeagal immigration?
It is the arrogant foreign policy that left the US without many friends. In many places, here in Europe and all over, people haven't forgotten the: you are with us or against us.
Assange merely put the finger on the sore spot, that is all.