muscogeemike
Active member
My first tour at Ft Bragg this subject came up. There seemed to be a general consensus among the “old time” SF soldiers that large knives were not good. They liked a 4“-5” blade knife to carry on their outer harness and a folding knife on their trousers belt (this was before multi-tools). They also thought carrying expensive knifes (Randal, etc) was not very smart. Knifes costing much less were just as good and when you lost them (which happens) you haven’t lost so much.
I remember after the movie Rambo came out many guys showed up at the SF Qualification course with knifes like were seen in the movie and caused many problems for the instructors, they seemed to believe knifes this size were only good for cutting down trees - and an axe or hatchet was better for that.
The bottom line is quality, mid range costing knifes and smaller blades. I don’t ever remember seeing a vet SF soldier carrying a K-bar.
Today I would have to go with a good multi-tool.
I remember after the movie Rambo came out many guys showed up at the SF Qualification course with knifes like were seen in the movie and caused many problems for the instructors, they seemed to believe knifes this size were only good for cutting down trees - and an axe or hatchet was better for that.
The bottom line is quality, mid range costing knifes and smaller blades. I don’t ever remember seeing a vet SF soldier carrying a K-bar.
Today I would have to go with a good multi-tool.