Per Ardua Ad Astra
That Rommel was losing fuel,equipment and supplies that he could not afford to lose is not a serious argument for remaining at Tobruk and adopting a defensive strategy : with such a strategy you can't win . Besides,by remaining defensive he also would lose fuel,equipment and supplies he could not afford to lose .
I never mentioned anything about Tobruk, those are your words not mine.
We disagree fundamentally : logistic problems do not cause defeats or failures, but are caused by defeats or failures .
You are saying logistic failures or problems do not cause defeats or failures? :lol:
Without proper logistic control to resupply fuel, replacement of soft skinned and armoured vehicles as well as personnel lost, any campaign is doomed to fail.
You obviously have never been employed with military logistics, otherwise you would not make such stupid statements
I'm not going to even try to debate with you, you do not know what you are talking about, and because quite frankly you're an idiot.
As someone said to me "You cannot convince an idiot he's wrong"