Damien435
Active member
Ok, I am watching what I think is The Day After, a made for TV movie about the possible outcome of a nuclear exchange between Russia and America. Now a question popped up in my head and I wanted to see what everyone else has to say on this subject.
In the event of a nuclear exchange between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, would it be better for the government to warn people of the impending danger or let them live the last 20 minutes of their lives blissfully unaware of what is about to happen to them?
Personally, I don't think any warning should be given to the general public. There is little that could be done to save people from these weapons, they are most likely going to die anyways, so why not let them die, not happy, but also not in a futile effort to save their own lives? Warning should be given to certain people, local and state politicians should be notifed, military personnel should be evacuated or taken to safety if possible.
In the event of a nuclear exchange between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, would it be better for the government to warn people of the impending danger or let them live the last 20 minutes of their lives blissfully unaware of what is about to happen to them?
Personally, I don't think any warning should be given to the general public. There is little that could be done to save people from these weapons, they are most likely going to die anyways, so why not let them die, not happy, but also not in a futile effort to save their own lives? Warning should be given to certain people, local and state politicians should be notifed, military personnel should be evacuated or taken to safety if possible.