Firearms Possession discussion (in response to yet another US shooting)

I3BrigPvSk said:
Will you Brits implement a new National Anthem in the US too? God Save ........Camilla???? She can be the Queen, right?

When you Red coats are marching in, don't count on the Canadians, they are busy drinking and snowmobiling
Click to expand...

It certainly won't be God save Camilla! :shock:

There will be a new national anthem, something along the lines of Rule Britannia. :D

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voeo0Oiox-c"]Rule Britannia (Royal Navy version) - YouTube[/ame]
 
Last edited:
I3BrigPvSk said:
Will you Brits implement a new National Anthem in the US too? God Save ........Camilla???? She can be the Queen, right?

When you Red coats are marching in, don't count on the Canadians, they are busy drinking and snowmobiling
Click to expand...


Here's Camilla s new anthem. ;)

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_PZPpWTRTU"]Mr. Ed - Intro (Opening Theme) - YouTube[/ame]
 
I3BrigPvSk said:
Will you Brits implement a new National Anthem in the US too? God Save ........Camilla???? She can be the Queen, right?
Click to expand...

I thought Richard Simmons already had that title?

0_61_320_Simmons2.jpg
 
I3BrigPvSk said:
Will you Brits implement a new National Anthem in the US too? God Save ........Camilla???? She can be the Queen, right?

When you Red coats are marching in, don't count on the Canadians, they are busy drinking and snowmobiling
Click to expand...

You guys can count on this Canadian! ;)
 
Capt Frogman said:
Not all bad, at least you kept our mother tongue - English. :D
Click to expand...
Heard a lot of strange "English" watching the Olympics.

Capt Frogman said:
I believe everyone should be able to defend themselves, their family and their possessions. I don't believe that a firearm is the answer, though.
....
Click to expand...
Probably a pretty silly question then. Besides they make less of a mess than a flamethrower does.

m551sheridan said:
we wooped them boys once........... we can do it again...

{{ "...We fired our guns and the British kept a-coming
There wasn't nigh as many as there was a while ago.
We fired once more, and they began to running,
On down the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico...." }}

them boys rather sandpaper a tigers azz then to mess with us.

cides, we ain'ts got much tea hereabouts.:p
Click to expand...
That was the 2nd time we whipped them! :-)
 
Hook160th said:
In the previous post that I quoted, you stated that training was a joke for all MOS`s except for the infantry. There just isn`t any way you can accurately say that. Whether you are a reservist, or regular Army, you are new to it. You haven`t been anywhere, you haven`t done anything. This isn`t meant to be a put down. In time, you`ll get experience. To truly get the big picture, you need to spend years on active duty. It was my experience that most people were well trained. If they were poor performers, it was because they wished to be. In my unit, they were quickly shown the door. The best thing you can do is be a good soldier and set the example.
Click to expand...

I understand what you're saying, I apologize, I didn't put my point across clearly. What I should more properly have stated was the fact that this new army getting soft on it's privates, there's so much NCOs can't do or hell even say to you anymore when you f*ck up. There's too much babying and not enough development of thick skin, like they're supposed to. I've personally gone through it, and have seen it, and the majority of the NCOs complain about it. And I agree with them, too much babying makes them complacent. I've seen several combat arms OSUTs while I was at Benning and I talked to the trainees, and they said pretty much none of that EO crap goes on where they were.

You're right, I don't have the experience to say that any MOS training is a joke, except for my own. And it was very much a freaking joke. It's changing to be a lot harder now, but from what i personally experienced, how in the hell did idiots get into a technical MOS in the first place, and then fail exams and get babyed with so many extra retakes?! But hey, this is just a brand new private getting his gripe session in and wishing that the Army was still the old one and not the new.
 
Capt Frogman said:
I believe everyone should be able to defend themselves, their family and their possessions. I don't believe that a firearm is the answer, though.
Click to expand...

It should be up to the individual to choose, a firearm, pepper spray, taser, stun gun or whatever.

During WW2 when my dad was 16 years old he was a member of the Home Guard, he was given a 30-06 BAR capable of fully automatic fire with a crap load of magazines, my granddad was issued a Lee Enfield with a bandolier of 50 rounds, both weapons were propped up in the corner of the room, yet no one went bonkers. The same goes for households throughout the UK during that time. As soon as the war was over the powers that be demanded that the firearms were handed back as the public couldn't be trusted with them.

Capt Frogman said:
Why are mass shootings so rare in the UK?
Click to expand...

That statement alone proves that the firearm laws should be relaxed.

Perhaps the real answer is below, Brits don't take as many prescribed drugs?.

The ‘Connecticut Shooter’ Adam Lanza has now been reported by mainstream media to indeed be taking the violence-linked anti-psychotic drug known as Fanapt

Fanapt has a very disturbing history of FDA testing and approval. It also has a long line of side effects that echo reports that drugs of this nature ultimately lead to suicidal behavior and increased overall aggression — side effects covered up by Big Pharma corporate scientists.

Knowing that virtually every major shooter of similar circumstance and scenario had been on similar drugs including the Columbine shooters, Ted Kaczinski the Unabomber’, and many others, it was easy to see that Adam Lanza fit the bill as well. Of course this prediction was met with opposition stating that Big Pharma’s anti-psychotic and anti-depressant drugs were ‘perfectly safe’ and I was simply assuming things based on no evidence. Of course the reality is that the very creator of Prozac, Eli Lilly & Co., actually kept the link between suicidal behavior and Prozac consumption a secret to protect their own interests.

This link was cleverly hidden for years until it broke back in 2005, yet still many are unaware of the real dangers.

But what about Fanapt, the drug Lanza was taking? The drug itself has an even more troubled past. After initially being rejected by the FDA for ‘severe problems’ in patients, Fanapt was eventually approved after a disturbing lack of study. Fanapt was only tested on around 500 people before going on sale to the almost 300 million citizens inside the United States for widespread ‘treatment’.

Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/predictio...e-linked-anti-psychotic-fanapt/#ixzz2FZcE9Flk
 
Last edited:
[QUOTE=BritinAfrica;. Fanapt was only tested on around 500 people before going on sale to the almost 300 million citizens inside the United States for widespread ‘treatment’.
Does that mean the whole of the USA is on this drug.
I'm astounded, no wonder they keep shooting each other.
 
BritinAfrica said:
During WW2 when my dad was 16 years old he was a member of the Home Guard, he was given a 30-06 BAR capable of fully automatic fire with a crap load of magazines, my granddad was issued a Lee Enfield with a bandolier of 50 rounds, both weapons were propped up in the corner of the room, yet no one went bonkers. The same goes for households throughout the UK during that time. As soon as the war was over the powers that be demanded that the firearms were handed back as the public couldn't be trusted with them.
Click to expand...

Weren't they handed back because the war was over? Therefore there was no need for firearms?

They could hardly defend the country from the Germans without a weapon hence why they were issued with them?

You can't really compare the people of 1940's Britian with the people of 2012's Britian...

BritinAfrica said:
That statement alone proves that the firearm laws should be relaxed.
Click to expand...

Is it? Doesn't it prove our laws work?

BritinAfrica said:
Perhaps the real answer is below, Brits don't take as many prescribed drugs?.

The ‘Connecticut Shooter’ Adam Lanza has now been reported by mainstream media to indeed be taking the violence-linked anti-psychotic drug known as Fanapt

Fanapt has a very disturbing history of FDA testing and approval. It also has a long line of side effects that echo reports that drugs of this nature ultimately lead to suicidal behavior and increased overall aggression — side effects covered up by Big Pharma corporate scientists.

Knowing that virtually every major shooter of similar circumstance and scenario had been on similar drugs including the Columbine shooters, Ted Kaczinski the Unabomber’, and many others, it was easy to see that Adam Lanza fit the bill as well. Of course this prediction was met with opposition stating that Big Pharma’s anti-psychotic and anti-depressant drugs were ‘perfectly safe’ and I was simply assuming things based on no evidence. Of course the reality is that the very creator of Prozac, Eli Lilly & Co., actually kept the link between suicidal behavior and Prozac consumption a secret to protect their own interests.

This link was cleverly hidden for years until it broke back in 2005, yet still many are unaware of the real dangers.

But what about Fanapt, the drug Lanza was taking? The drug itself has an even more troubled past. After initially being rejected by the FDA for ‘severe problems’ in patients, Fanapt was eventually approved after a disturbing lack of study. Fanapt was only tested on around 500 people before going on sale to the almost 300 million citizens inside the United States for widespread ‘treatment’.

Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/predictio...e-linked-anti-psychotic-fanapt/#ixzz2FZcE9Flk
Click to expand...

Have all the mass shooters been on this drug?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top