BritinBritain
Per Ardua Ad Astra
I'd like to think soldiers would be more competent to use firearms compared to civilians. After all, they were trained to use their weapons?
The difference is and this has been recognised by government a few years ago, Civilians are more likely to care for their own firearms and not abuse them. If I had a problem with my L1A1, GPMG or Sterling, I simply handed it to the armourer
But nothing like WW2 though?
During the recent riots in London and other cities, one elderly chap remarked, "This is worse that the blitz."
Were people shot and/or massacred?
No, they just had their heads opened up with a small axe, bought at Harrods BTW.
Hence why I said "according" to the figures.![]()
As I said, I am very suspicious of so called official statistics, they can be fudged to say what you want them to say.
Ah yes, the Home Office. If they said it, then it must be right!
The Home Office think they are right. BTW who authorises what type of firearms plod use? Whomever it is, they must be total idiots, using a H&K MP5 in a place like Heathrow airport with it marlble walls and floors, Mk2Z 9mm Parabellum ammunition will have innocent bodies laying everywhere.
I'll get back to you on the origin of firearms used statistics.![]()
I'd be interested.
Probably, although Obama's changes should change this?
I have no idea
Governments can bring in all the gun laws they want, they can ban guns totally, but that won't stop criminals getting them because criminals don't obey gun laws, only the law abiding do.
Last edited: