I see the right still hasn't let go of their fantasies with Bill Clinton. He's married, he as several girlfriends, but don't fret, there are lots of other fish in the sea. And whoever wrote this blog this was didn't read the full Newsweek article in its entirety.
Its true that Clinton didn't ask the CIA to 'kill' OBL, but in the very next paragraph it did say that he asked him to 'capture' him in 1998. The point Clinton was making during the FOX interview that he DID ask the CIA to target bin Laden. Are we really going to nit-pick between the words 'kill' 'capture'?
BTW, I saw the original Chris Wallace interview, since the whole interview (its on Youtube) was an extremely bias hatchet job designed to embarrass him and that Clinton was visibly upset because of it, (Clinton was invited to talk about his non-profit organization and Wallace changed the question format without telling him ahead of time, -typical FOX NEWS bait and switch tactics) its quite normal that he made a very small misstatement of little importance.
(My only criticism of Clinton was that he went on at all, since FOX has a reputation for Dirty play I wouldn't have even bothered).
So in short it was a very small mistatement compared to the whoppers like 'Saddam has a WMD program' or 'Saddam Hussien was involved with al-Qaeda' BTW, the people who said those things are still in the White House.
About Hillary,
If Hillary wins it will be because the American people chose her. Now I am not a big of Hillary (I prefer Edwards or Obama), but if she should win it will be because the GOP couldn't produce anybody better.
And that's what is truly sad...
One final point of correction: Neither Hillary or Bill are liberal. They are moderate Democrats (just look at their record).