bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15772356/CLARKSVILLE, Tenn. - An art exhibit featuring deep-fried American flags, complete with peanut oil and black pepper, has been removed by a museum director in this military-friendly town.
Art student William Gentry said his piece, "The Fat Is in the Fire," was a commentary on obesity in America. "I deep-fried the flag because I'm concerned about America and about America's health," Gentry said.
Customs House Museum executive director Ned Crouch took down the artwork Wednesday less than 18 hours after it went up in this community next to Fort Campbell.
"It's about what the community values," Crouch said. "I'm representing 99 percent of our membership — educators, doctors, lawyers, military families."
He also said the timing of the piece could cause "incendiary reactions."
"Never in the history of the country has the flag been more hated or more loved," Crouch said.
Treatment of the American flag is an ongoing and passionate debate in the United States.
Burning a flag at political protests is a guaranteed way to start scuffles and fistfights, and often to be arrested. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, has ruled that flag-burning is a constitutionally protected form of legal political protest.
Conservative politicians periodically attempt to rally support for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to ban flag-burning, but have always fallen short in their efforts.
The exhibit featured three U.S. flags imprinted with phrases such as "Poor people are obese because they eat poorly" and more than 40 smaller flags fried in peanut oil, egg batter, flour and black pepper.
Navy vet: ‘Museum ... totally failed’
Clarksville resident and Navy veteran Bill Larson said the museum should not restrict the free speech of an artist based on public response.
"The museum is obligated to the citizens of the community to present art, and it totally failed in that regard," Larson said.
Gentry, who had to publicly display his work for a senior project at Austin Peay State University, said he hoped people would get past the flag imagery and address the health issue.
"I hope they are upset, but I hope they don't miss the point," he said.
Should the desecration of national symbols be protected as legitimate political protest? Not just in the US but each of you consider it for your own countries as well. I am firmly against flag-buirning being protected. Do it in front of me and I'll kick your ass, plain and simple. I'll cop getting arrested as its something I firmly believe.
I very vividly recall the orders I was given as a young soldier about to be given the privilege of being guidon bearer. The guidon is the unit flag, not even the US flag, that every unit carries in front of itself when marching in parades etc. A former Marine who served three tours in Vietnam and was now a SSG for the Army, SSG Fritz, pulled me aside and got in my face as he was about to hand me the guidon and asked if I realised the importance of what I was about to do? I honestly answered him NO and he proceeded to educate me at full volume about the history and importance of the guidon bearer in battle. It ended with the serious instruction that if I were to lose this guidon for any reason it would be in my best interest to go AWOL and run as fast and as far as I could away from him.
To him to lose that unit flag was to spit on and dishonor the memory and sacrifice of every man from our unit who ever died in service of our country. I see the American flag in the same light. To me to desecrate the American flag is to spit on the graves of every man and woman buried in Arlington. To burn that flag is to dishonor the memory of every person who ever died in our country's history in defence of her. I'll be damned if I sit and watch anyone do that.
Last edited: