2008 OLYMPICS.

Never thought I would quote Fox but this is too good to miss

After jetting into Beijing [Australian sports minister Kate Ellis] said the British were getting a bit ahead of themselves by suggesting they would top Australia for the first time in 20 years. And she reminded the British of their dubious record when performing in the heat of battle.
Click to expand...
http://www.foxsports.com.au/beijing_olympics/story/0,23599,24138334-5014107,00.html

Minister Gerry Sutcliffe has bet his shirt on one of the fiercest rivalries in world sport: Britain v Australia. The sports minister promised to wear the Old Enemy's green and gold if Team GB is beaten in the Beijing Olympic medals table. Meanwhile, his Australian counterpart is offering to don red, white and blue if Britain does better.
Click to expand...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7548855.stm

there is one day to go, and the number of medals so far? GB has 47 medals to Australia's 46 ;-)
 
Last edited:
Well its been an outstanding Olympics for China topping the medal table with 51 gold medals, a tremendous achievement considering they only gained their first in 1984. Jamaica dominated the short sprints and have done exceptionally well considering their small population, as have Australia (as usual). GB have also done well in relation to their previous poor showings holding up some promise for London, but their medals are still concentrated in a few areas and have still have some way to go in the more prestigious athletic events.
 
perseus said:
Well its been an outstanding Olympics for China topping the medal table with 51 gold medals, a tremendous achievement considering they only gained their first in 1984. Jamaica dominated the short sprints and have done exceptionally well considering their small population, as have Australia (as usual). GB have also done well in relation to their previous poor showings holding up some promise for London, but their medals are still concentrated in a few areas and have still have some way to go in the more prestigious athletic events.
Click to expand...


Do me a favour Perseus. Great Britain did extremely well over wide areas, best result for 100 years. Third in the rankings, behind only China, USA, and, just, Russia.

Included sprint gold, high jump silver. triple jump silver, and our sprint team over 100 metres, Olympic champions at the time, only slipped from the reckoning by a baton change error. It is true that we have lost our middle distance giants, but this time it was about the team overall. Boxing gold and two bronze, cycling, swimming, open water swimming. Fantastic effort, brilliant result. Track and field next time. But twenty golds and seventy + overall is a sensational outcome.
 
Del Boy said:
Do me a favour Perseus. Great Britain did extremely well over wide areas, best result for 100 years. Third in the rankings, behind only China, USA, and, just, Russia.
Click to expand...

Well perhaps I was trying to tone it down so as not to piss of the Australian's NOT! 8) Yeah all right then why not promote us one more place! PS didn't we have a bet with them?

No seriously, let me illustrate my point, yes best result for 100 years but is that is mainly because the past results were dire once most other countries got in on the act. It is highly concentrated in one event. Without the cycling we got 11 Golds, this compares with 16 for Germany, 8 for Italy and 7 for France. GB would have got 33 medals overall compared with Germany's 41 medals and France's 40 (in fact we didn't get that many more medals than them even including the cycling) As Steve Ovett said the main problem is complacency, the government are out to cut costs, and the hard facts are that the international audience tend to remember the track, this will be forever the Olympics of Usain Bolt.

Sorry to put it into perspective, yes it was a good Olympics for GB but perhaps not quite as good as the hysteria suggests. One other point as well, is Cycling a truly athletic achievement or has it got a bit like motor racing were the technology is as important as the athlete so is it such a coincidence that we have done well in this discipline?
 
Last edited:
Perseus - I think you could apply your equation to most countries. The results table tells the real story. We have been very well represented in medals on the track in times past. Decathlon, long jump, 100 metres, 200 metres, middle distance, hurdles, where we produced great champions. Now we have learned that it is the team effort that counts. I agree with you regarding the politics, but also bear in mind that soccer etc. is diverting great athletes from the track events because of the rewards.:-)

I see no reason for us to revert to our natural modesty;-) and avoid taking a bow. Anyone who doubts our new dawn can come to London in 2012, if they think they are hard enough!:horsie:
 
Del Boy said:
but also bear in mind that soccer etc. is diverting great athletes from the track events because of the rewards.:-)
Yes this is a problem, shame they can't play soccer really :-). The club mentality is another, people are cocooned in their enthusiasm for a group of overpaid foreign players playing another group of overpaid foreign players representing a side that probably bars little relation to where even most of the fans actually live. Clubs have become businesses who thrive on advertising and loyalty.

'National sports' is even a more serious problem for under-performing nations such as India and Pakistan. Except for them what % of the worlds population even understands how to play cricket? It also makes me wonder how strong the US would be if not similarly obsessed with 'national' sports that few others understand.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
As a life-long soccer fan, I think it is somewhat sad that the clubs no longer represent their local areas; I thought it was brilliant when Keegan, in his first stint as Newcastle manager, would have liked to put together a team of Geordies. They supply a constant stream of talent from that area.

As far as a Great Britain soccer Olympic entry is concerned, I think I lean towards an amateur representation.:smile:
 
Here are the medals Michael Phelps got from the Beijing Olympics:

1. Gold - 400 M Individual Medley (4:03.84 (wr) )
2. Gold - 4 x 100 M Freestyle Relay (3:08.24 (wr) )
3. Gold - 200 M Freestyle (1:42.96 (wr) )
4. Gold - 200 M Butterfly (1:52.03 (wr) )
5. Gold - 4 x 200 M Freestyle Relay (6:58.56 (wr) )
6. Gold - 200 M Individual Medley (1:54.23 (wr) )
7. Gold - 100 M Butterfly (50.58 (or) )
8. Gold - 4 x 100 M Medley Relay (3:29.34 (wr) )

Congrats to Michael Fred Phelps !!!

Source : Athlete

:jump:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top