![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Quote:
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
Quote:
|
![]() |
||
|
Quote:
And is most likely either british or american ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Well UK and Belgians using "Commando" for non Special Forces type of units isn't out of the ordinary. Remember that special operations started off as what are now more commonly considered Ranger missions.
The SAS in World War II was more reminiscent of today's US Army Rangers than of today's SAS. The SAS evolved into a modern SF unit, while the Belgian Paracommandos, who's symbol is identical to the SAS because of its history of being founded as an SAS unit, continued to serve the role that it traditionally played in World War II while a seperate SF unit was created. |
![]() |
|||
|
Quote:
Sissi is straightly translated as guerilla and sissikomppania as guerilla company, but what does exactly mean the term "guerilla"? Is it a soldier or something like iraqi insurgents? |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Guerilla warfare is simply using small groups of men to attack and harass the enemy. It can be devastating to morale and if done properly can be very effective against an enemy. Take Iraq for example, men with 0 training and low quality weapons are racking up allot of kills on the US military. Imagine if it was a highly trained unit like the Rangers doing these guerilla attacks. The Korean war is a perfect example. Rangers would go against overwhelming numbers and cause massive amounts of damage against the enemy while taking few if any losses at all using these tactics.
|
![]() |