Which country might be responsible for the disaster of 9/11

I Give Credit to The Good allies and Friends of the Bush Family, Non other than.....Saudi Arabia, 15 Hijackers come from that nation, Osama Bin laden is from that nation, His family ( though they disagree with him) His family is also the second richest family in saudi arabia, second only to the Royal family and his family is well known in Saudi Arabia, even tonigh they had a special on CNN talking about how all these people in Sauudi Arabia was joining The Taliban.....


Just Little pieces of Info....on why I thought it was Saudi Arabia.
 
Terrorists come from asia, russia, middle east, americas,europe and midde east. there is no single country that is responsible. Only terrorists
 
Afganistan, obviously is one. Well they are toast, but if I had to point to another... Saudi Arabia of course. The cradle of fundamentalism, they have indirectly funded fundamentalist schools and terror cells through various "charitys". Israel and Palistine could be considered partly "responsible" too.
 
Dameon said:
I Give Credit to The Good allies and Friends of the Bush Family,
Click to expand...


And Clinton wasn't friendly to Saudi Arabia?
Get a grip, Dameon, try making posts without bringing your personal agendas and hangups into it every once in awhile, or provide some sources and more information to back up what you insinuate.


Kirill K, could you add some more to your topic?
 
Well I think the first news always are the best news and the first to take responsibility for the attack over here on swedish news got it taped and all was the Palestinian group PFLP that was rebuked and took it back faster then lightning. It was a joint operation where no one could take all the "glory" I think. If there had been any proof of the Palestinians involved they could have kissed their state goodbye and losed all the open support from Europe. I think this is one of the main resons this war looks even more complicated then it should have looked otherwise. I would say it was PFLP togheter with Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan terrorists in a joint operation. I find it very hard to see Iraq been involved more then Saddam Hussein in the close relations to the past Yasser Arafat maby as some kind of moral punch. Then we have Iran and different European countries (sweden exclusivly included) that shelter terrorists/terrorist organisations and the founding of them, it is still open and running and happens even today on my streets so I would not be to suprised if there was a joint operation with all these elements involved. It had to be a state or states founded operation to pull this off and it was indeed a very well planed operation, not a half ass suicide bombing mission as we are used to see, just my 2 cents. 8)

Today in sweden Hamas is on swedish servers you find this home page over here - It is stamped as a terrorist webbsite by swedish terrorist specialists and even by the EU Hamas is terrorist stamped, but swedish law alows it, and our primeminister was the only state chief from scandinavia to visit the ceremony in Egypt. I didnt find him rushing down to spain after the train bomb. I wonder where I can get in touch with the C.I.A ?they probably need more agents in sweden then you find in the Yellow Pages :lol:


Cheers:
Doc.S
:viking:
 
IMO I have this theory i call "Kamikaze". I believe that Japan could be one of the responsible for doing this terrible disaster. It's because if you think back....... the WW2 ended with 2 A-bombs dropped on Japan. Also remmember the attack on Pearl Harbour, Kamikaze planes falling into the warships and killing inocent people. Then how else can Japan repay USA for total destruction that was dropped on them on Aug. 6 and Aug. 9. They used Kamikaze's to do this mission. Also this would be the country that no one would suspect. Also the qpprotunity at his grasp Bush said that the Arabs were responsible for this disaster. Why you ask?? To get oil from Iraq because they had little contracts with the country, and Iraq as a prospering country, on oil beneath it. Another thing is i believe that the Arabs were unable to plan this attack and carry it out by themselves, because they aren't able to know how to penetrate the US security systems, to take control of the plane.


I'm not sayin that this is the truth of any sort, but it's something to think about.
 
Are you joking? Firstly, the Japanese did not use Kamikazee in Pearl Harbor, only later in the war. Secondly...Common. If you make allegations like that you must have some sort of sources. Do you seriously think that 19 Arabs were hired by the Japanese govermen to preform an attack to revenge actions from 60 years ago?!
 
Kirill K said:
IMO I have this theory i call "Kamikaze". I believe that Japan could be one of the responsible for doing this terrible disaster. It's because if you think back....... the WW2 ended with 2 A-bombs dropped on Japan. Also remmember the attack on Pearl Harbour, Kamikaze planes falling into the warships and killing inocent people. Then how else can Japan repay USA for total destruction that was dropped on them on Aug. 6 and Aug. 9. They used Kamikaze's to do this mission. Also this would be the country that no one would suspect. Also the qpprotunity at his grasp Bush said that the Arabs were responsible for this disaster. Why you ask?? To get oil from Iraq because they had little contracts with the country, and Iraq as a prospering country, on oil beneath it. Another thing is i believe that the Arabs were unable to plan this attack and carry it out by themselves, because they aren't able to know how to penetrate
the US security systems, to take control of the plane.



I'm not sayin that this is the truth of any sort, but it's something to think about.
Click to expand...

Pearl Harbor was a battle, kamikaze was a strategy used later in the war and the A-bombs were droped to end the war, get your history right
 
HAHAHA i know my history my friend and thats what i clearly said "It's because if you think back....... the WW2 ended with 2 A-bombs dropped on Japan." And now my friends, Kamikazes were used in the WW2 and in Pearl Harbor, its something you should read about. And how do u know maybe they want to get back on USA without nuclear weapons.
 
Kirill K said:
HAHAHA i know my history my friend and thats what i clearly said "It's because if you think back....... the WW2 ended with 2 A-bombs dropped on Japan." And now my friends, Kamikazes were used in the WW2 and in Pearl Harbor, its something you should read about. And how do u know maybe they want to get back on USA without nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...

Pearl harbor '41 was a battle, and there was no need for kamikaze tactics, they fought with honor. When the fleet was not doing so well in '43 they started to crash ships, and the Bombings happaned in '45 so you cannot have actions of '43 happane because of 45' in '41
 
The House of Saud, which the US is friends with, does not speak or represent the population of Saudi Arabia.
The Royal family is in fact, quite unpopular in several places in that country.
 
I saw a documentary on CNN about Saudi Arabia named 'Kingdom On The Brink", though the ppl might be hating the Royal Family, they do have total control over the state and they have some extremely strict islamic laws.Life for westerners is hell there.If you say the Royal family supports the US why don't they change these orthodox islamic religious laws which are reponsible for nurturing terrorism/terrorists ?!?.In fact they also showed some educated muslims trying to coerce the Royals to shift from this extremist path, but they don't budge, hope those who try to alter their thoughts don't get beheaded.
 
I think I know where Krill K is going with his ranting, I think he is talking about the five Japanese mini-subs that slipped into the harbor, nine out of the 10 men on board these minisubs died, whether they were meant to be suicide attacks is unclear, the subs did have the capability to head back to the fleet, but in reality that was unlikely in a harbor on lock down. Hell, one of those subs were sunk upon trying to enter the harbor one hour before the attack. But these were not kamikaze's, the mini-subs were armed with torpedoes, they were not meant to just simply run into the boats, in fact I think they all failed in their objectives and sank, except the one that washed up on shore.

The thought that Japan could be responsible for the attacks of 9/11 is ludicrous, Japan's economy also suffered from the attacks, the United States' greatest trade deficit is greatest with Japan over that of any other nation. I also heard that some Palestinian Terrorist group had claimed responsiblity for the attacks of 9/11, but Al Qaeda is the only terror group that had the ability to pull it off, the US would have seen this attack coming from any other nation, we have spies or informants in all the governments that could have pulled this off, but then again the same is most likely true in the other direction. The evidence before and after the attack all pointed towards Al Qeada, Osama Bin Laden is responsible for the attacks, heck, he had a history of such actions.
 
Darkmb101 said:
No single country is responsible for 9/11 because if they were they would have claimed credit.
Click to expand...

Only two countries would dare do such a thing, Russia or China, I don't think either one could keep it a secret either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top