BritinBritain
Per Ardua Ad Astra
No doubt the sergeants killing was a terrorist act. But if the British would have given the cought members of Irgun (who didn't kill anyone) a long prison sentence instead of a death sentence the sergeants would not have been hanged or kidnapped. About your link. I always find it fishy when you do an inernet search and you get many times the same document only with a different layout.The endnotes do not refer to a text in the document so that makes it difficult to find out if it is true. Also the reference to "United Nations Security Counsel Official Records, Semiramis, 1948, Document S/740" is not to be found on the UNC website, and they list all the documents. Besides, a wording as "The Jewish Agency terrorist forces" is not exactly UNC language.
I also couldn't find the book "Menachem Begin. "The Revolt." (London, W. H. Allen, 1983.)". I have found a copy from Steimatzky's Agency Limited. I am very sceptical about that article. But like I said the killing of the sergeants was a terrorist act.
I don't give a toss if you find it suspicious or not sunbeam, it happened.
So you agree to killing innocent people by the British just because they are Jewish? If that is your case then I must say that the Israelis were right to fight the British.
Being a NAZI Zionist I suppose you would support the killing of British troops. Its ok for the Jews commit acts of terror then you expect their targets to sit back and say "Oh well never mind." According to you its OK for Israelis to retaliate against Palestinians, but its not OK for British troops to fight back.
But he was not in charge
The Palestine Mandate says:
"Whereas His Britannic Majesty has accepted the mandate in respect of Palestine and undertaken to exercise it on behalf of the League of Nations in conformity with the following provisions"
So what if Winston Churchill wasn't in charge? I suggest you do a bit more research. If you had you would find that the British people were sick and tired of innocent British deaths.
Tell that to the parents of the Jewish boy who was killed because an rpg destroyed the school bus.
Why don't you tell that to the families of the two British Sergeants who were murdered.
well, if I would use your logic (see above), I would say not long enough but I won't because I regret the death of innocent people who are killed through collateral damage.
Are you naturally stupid or did your parents drop you on your head? The list is PHYSICALLY TOO LONG TO POST ON HERE, IT WONT FIT YOU PRATT!!!!
Don't focus on the minority because that gives you a wrong picture.
No it doesn't, it shows the mentality of these people.
They were deported (by the High Commissionner) to a prison camp in Mauritius (an island of the Britis Colonial Empire) and they would stay there until 1945 (Disorderly Decolonization: The White Paper of 1939 and the End of British Rule in Palestine page 139)
History of the Jews in Mauritius
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Judaism is a minor religion in Mauritius. The first Jews arrived from Haifa, British Palestine (now Israel), in the 1940s because they were denied entry to Palestine by the British Government.There currently are about 40 Jews in total in Mauritius. There is a synagogue in Curepipe, and a Jewish cemetery in Bambous.
DENIED ENTRY!!!! WHAT PART OF DENIED ENTRY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?????
That does not mean that you are not allowed to defend yourself against the Arab attacks. There was no reason at all to start attacking the Jews in Jerusalem , native Palestinian Jews BTW)
Neither does it mean treating Palestinian Arabs like vermin to be bullied and trampled at the will of the Israeli's.
What Hitler did to the Jews, the Jews are no different, they are doing the same to Palestinian Arabs.
Yes I am a firm supporter but not of the religious fanatics.
Bullsh!te, you are a Jewish propagandist who spouts propaganda rubbish that the Jews are whiter then snow and are the innocent victims, that the real aggressors are the Palestinian Arabs. I take note that you have not spoken out against the war crimes committed by Israeli troops such as:-http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/23/israel-gaza-war-crimes-guardian. The Guardian has compiled detailed evidence of alleged war crimes committed by Israel during the 23-day offensive in the Gaza Strip earlier this year, involving the use of Palestinian children as human shields and the targeting of medics and hospitals.
A month-long investigation also obtained evidence of civilians being hit by fire from unmanned drone aircraft said to be so accurate that their operators can tell the colour of the clothes worn by a target.
The testimonies form the basis of three Guardian films which add weight to calls this week for a full inquiry into the events surrounding Operation Cast Lead, which was aimed at Hamas but left about 1,400 Palestinians dead, including more than 300 children.
The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) refused to respond directly to the allegations made against its troops, but issued statements denying the charges and insisted international law had been observed.
The latest disclosures follow soldiers' evidence published in the Israeli press about the killing of Palestinian civilians and complaints by soldiers involved in the military operation that the rules of engagement were too lax.
Amnesty International has said Hamas should be investigated for executing at least two dozen Palestinian men in an apparent bout of score-settling with rivals and alleged collaborators while Operation Cast Lead was under way.
Human rights groups say the vast majority of offences were committed by Israel, and that the Gaza offensive was a disproportionate response to Hamas rocket attacks. Since 2002, there have been 21 Israeli deaths by Hamas rockets fired from Gaza, and during Operation Cast Lead there were three Israeli civilian deaths, six Israeli soldiers killed by Palestinian fire and four killed by friendly fire.
"Only an investigation mandated by the UN security council can ensure Israel's co-operation, and it's the only body that can secure some kind of prosecution," said Amnesty's Donatella Rovera, who spent two weeks in Gaza investigating war crime allegations. "Without a proper investigation there is no deterrent. The message remains the same: 'It's OK to do these things, there won't be any real consequences'."
Some of the most dramatic testimony gathered by the Guardian came from three teenage brothers in the al-Attar family. They describe how they were taken from home at gunpoint, made to kneel in front of Israeli tanks to deter Hamas fighters from firing, and sent by Israeli soldiers into Palestinian houses to clear them. "They would make us go first so if any fighters shot at them the bullets would hit us, not them," 14-year-old Al'a al-Attar said.
Medics and ambulance drivers said they were targeted when they tried to tend to the wounded; sixteen were killed. According to the World Health Organisation, more than half of Gaza's 27 hospitals and 44 clinics were damaged by Israeli bombs.
First, the use of M825A1 white phosphorous shells (approved for use by NATO) is not prohibited but there are restrictions. The Israelis used it as a smoke screen in Gaza which is allowed. The IDF did not cover it up but it took them days to confirm.
Phosphorus as a smoke screen??? Why not use smoke shells instead? Again you are talking utter bollocks.
Yeah, like putting a fake gun to someone will put you in jail for attemted murder!
Hmm a fake missile? What is your idea of a fake missile?
Last edited: