Wars, Revolutions, etc
What do you think , they make history, what was us without ww2.
Without these history books will be born/die report.
Moxen WW2 was the greatest catastrophe to ever hit the face of the earth and caused more death, pain and suffering than is imaginable. With input from more recent historians > 60 million people died in the European theater alone. ~ 25 million innocents were murdered-killed by the Nazi's, several million more were murdered by Stalin. > 22 million men at arms died during the course of the conflict in Europe. Millions more civilians died incidental to the fighting via bombing, shelling, etc. Whole cities were reduced to ashes.
This isn't even taking into account the conflict in the far east.
Your statement is the most callus and ridiculous insult possible.
I think you should study the CIA after ww2, I'm agreed with Hassan Abbasi[a strategist] that we passed 3rd ww and were in the 4th, the fire under ashes, and unfortunately no one can change the game, your soldiers are in our borders at least 49 mil. Bases and this cant mean peace the conflict isn't so far , and we dont want fight in our home when can fight in your home.
There has been no conflict since or before WW2 to rival WW2, this is bunk. In fact you could tally up all the people killed in wars since WW2 and they wouldn't add up to the WW2 death toll.
The misdemeanors of the CIA do not even come close to the killing and suppression of human rights committed by Iran's revolutionary guard. In Iran the breaking of certain religious laws or making of antigovernment political statements results in imprisonment-torture-death. This is by no means the case in the US.
Most of these so called American crimes exist only in your mind.
But I never mentioned the T-72?
On the subject of that though, why do you think the Iraqi armored corps had no experience and barely any training? They had just gotten done fighting for a decade against Iran. The Republican guard in particular had exceptional training- both to advance their own political careers in the militaristic government, and to make a name for themselves by in my opinion fancying themselves the modern SS.
The Syrians and Egyptians had decently trained armor crews, not much less training then the typical russian crews. Russia has never trained its men particularly well ( one only needs to look at its airforce) What makes you think they would fair significantly better then the Iraqis, Syrians, or Egyptians?
The Germans are no one's fools and their training is just as complex as any other NATO members. Superior crew, superior tank, same result- burning Russian scrap heap after being slapped around by the Germans.
I think it would be a much better match fighting our Abrahams, the Leopard two is a more than worthy adversary to face in battle.