In Singapore 1941 General Yamashita pounded on the table and told General Percival that you must surrender you have me out numbered 3 to 1 Percy bought it and surrendered .:hide:
Using hindsight it would have been much better for the Brits at Singapore and the Germans at Stalingrad if they had fought on .
I am aware of the hard facts concerning Singapore but as Churchill said this was the worse defeat in the history of the Empire he was furious at Percy .
Using hindsight it would have been much better for the Brits at Singapore and the Germans at Stalingrad if they had fought on .
I think he was trying to point out that had the British forces known what was ahead of them in Japanese captivity, it may have been preferable to fight it out even with all the limitations.
Whether or not that is a reasonable assumption is up for debate...I think if I knew I was about to be captured by ISIS(or the Japanese of 1941/ Russians in 1943) I would rather take my chances dying on my own terms as opposed to execution, starvation, overwork, disease, gulag, freezing to death, torture or any number of ways you could die in these instances...of course, hindsight is 20/20...foresight is much more difficult.
I think he was trying to point out that had the British forces known what was ahead of them in Japanese captivity, it may have been preferable to fight it out even with all the limitations.
Whether or not that is a reasonable assumption is up for debate...I think if I knew I was about to be captured by ISIS(or the Japanese of 1941/ Russians in 1943) I would rather take my chances dying on my own terms as opposed to execution, starvation, overwork, disease, gulag, freezing to death, torture or any number of ways you could die in these instances...of course, hindsight is 20/20...foresight is much more difficult.
In the case of the 6th army and parts of 4th panzer army at Stalingrad they had no food or ammunition left to fight with and were freezing and starving. Also the vast majority of them had already died or been wounded so only ~ 1/5 of the army actually surrendered. The fate of all POW's taken on the eastern front was very grim.
This is not correct : it is the old German propaganda that faced by the choice between surrender to the Soviets and dying for the Führer,the German soldier preffered the the latter .
German strength on 15 october (including reinforcements til 3 february):
339009 men
a)not in the pocket (= not encircled) :156269
b) transported from the pocket : 16345
c) remaining in the pocket : 158630
d) not clarified : 7765
From those remaining in the pocket,some 91000 surrendered between 31 january and 3 february,and some 10000 surrendered before.
This means that the majority of the Germans who were encircled (b+ possibly d) surrendered to the Soviets and that a minority died .An unknown part of these were KIA,the others became DOW/died of illness.
Source = WWII stats ,abwicklungsstab group A Stalingrad.
WWII stats is using the official German sources (BA/MA) ,thus,one can consider these as reliable .
Yes, American forces did surrender in the Philippines, after holding out for five and half months, out of everything, ammunition, food, medical supplies. There was no disgrace in their surrender; anger, disappointment, shock but no disgrace. Churchill was aware of this when he heard of the fall of Singapore. He was in the White House visiting President Roosevelt. Churchill felt that they should have held out longer. There were clearly some leadership problems at Singapore and General Percival was not the only the wrong choice for command. Some of his subordinates let him down. They simply had never accepted the idea that Singapore could be attacked in the manner it was and by the Japanese, an adversary for whom they had contempt.
The Japanese advance down the Malaysian peninsular is one for the history books by the time the Japs arrived in the Singapore area they were out of food , ammunition and troops , there were only about 30,000 of them Percy had about 100,000 .