News Manager
Milforums News Bot

Read more...
Told you so.
After the Ft. Hood attack was called "terrorism," I do not see why this wouldn't be called terrorism either.
Chupike, you are wrong about the guy not pushing a bigger agenda:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1966476,00.html
"I choose not to pretend that business as usual won't continue," he wrote. "I have just had enough. I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt."
"... American zombies wake up and revolt."
Sounds like a bigger agenda to me.
So when the Islamic "terrorists" refer to American infidels, I suppose that is only a reference to Americans who have cheated on their loved ones and therefore is relevant only to people who are guilty of infidelity?
You think?When he added "American zombies," he is referring to the American public in general. It is called a figure of speech. An expression. Look up "figure of speech" in a reference book or site.
The above statement would seem to apply to your ramblings more than what I posted.You really ought to try to involve yourself with the actual discussion at hand, rather than attempting to derail it with irrelevant nitpicking, something you tend to do whenever your argument hits a brick wall. That too by the way, was a figure of speech. I am not referring to the sound waves caused by your vocal chords impacting against a wall made of bricks. Just helping you out there.