A Can of Man
Je suis aware
Well who cares? The point is, yes, the math matches up.
Vitaly said:Charge_7 said:Did you read what I said?
Can you explain the difference between "a greater ability to stay on target" and "for higher probability of hit"? Obviously there is none.
I thought that there is a difference. I figured that with say the An-94 there is a high probability of hit due to the fact that with the high ROF there are two bullets going down range before the felt recoil affects sight alignment. Which results in more rounds where you aimed your first shot. For a greater ability to stay on target, it could mean that there is so little felt recoil that the sight alignment remains centered regardless of the amount of rounds that go throught it. For example if you use a conversion kit on an m-16 to the .22lr caliber. You could empty clips without the sights becoming un-aligned. That is something that is more difficult to do with a higher caliber weapon so the fact that the An-94 does have a higher probability of hit (since there are more bullets being shot without the shooter shifting the sight picture) but since the recoil is felt afterward anyway, it doesn't help in reaquiring the target which would mean nothing in the greater ability to keep the sights on target for more follow-up shots.
I agree. But if they shot from the right side (assuming), then the journalist should have been dead. They showed the left side bullet holes, commen sense says that one does not fire at each other from opposite directions in any situation, especially not if you are at a checkpost 30 yards apart.Italian Guy said:Yeah, but there's a but. The vehicle was reportedly shot upon from the right so its right side is supposed to have been damaged. They didn't show it. Just to make the point clear.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.