In the past threads there was a lot of talk about the cartoons and the freedom of speech. It was an exaggeration and we had the right to publish what we wanted.
I found this link and wondered if there is a difference. Cartoons aren't pictures that's true. But infringement on the freedom of speech remains the same....... So; is there a difference?
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/SBS-broadcasts-graphic-Abu-Ghraib-images/2006/02/15/1139890809467.html
I found this link and wondered if there is a difference. Cartoons aren't pictures that's true. But infringement on the freedom of speech remains the same....... So; is there a difference?
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/SBS-broadcasts-graphic-Abu-Ghraib-images/2006/02/15/1139890809467.html