Domestic terrorism?

Whatever 03. YouTube ain't the best of my friends.

The perception I have gotten from reading your posts is just that- that you have broad brushed Americans as a whole. But you definitely broad brushed survivalists. And I know for a fact you have never met a true survivalist. Militant radicals, perhaps. Wanna-be militiamen, maybe. But never a true survivalist. WE don't wage wars, we only fight in self-defense and WTSHTF we'll "be survivin'!", and we'll want to be left alone. Wage you own wars your way, leave us out of it. Dont' drag us into it. Discussions are one thing, but outright fights are another.

I figure you and I will never agree on this matter, so this is the last I say anything about it in this thread. I think both of us have far better things to do in life.

And yeah I'll dig up what I have on those arrests/investigations.
 
03USMC said:
The MIAC report was disavowed because it was wrong and most likely politically motivated. When the report was issued the Mo Sheriffs Assn, Mo Deputy Sheriffs Assn, Mo Police Chiefs Assn, and the FOP all registered protests. Keathly investigated and supposedly the anaylist and Supervisor (civilian employees) responsible for the report and it's release are no longer at MIAC.

-snip-

Then what are talking about as far as investigations being launched by the state? What investigaions.
Click to expand...
You wanted it, you got it. This is what I dragged up via Google. I had to replace a HD since the elections, and all the stuff apparently was there and not the back HD. I'll find it though. Here goes-

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/attacking-obama.html

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=da3_1242326972&c=1

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-bl...rs-obama-truth-squad-getting-old-media-silenc

http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZmZmZDg3NjkzMTk3OGZiMjc0YjVhOWUyY2I5YjY1ZTE=

http://www.kmov.com/localnews/stories/kmov_election_092808_truthsquad.bec69e89.html
 
How weak can you come?

Byer and ST Louis County Democrats ? Thats what your bringin? Gimmie a break. thats what you got? LMMFAO!

You didn't even read your own damn sources did you?If you had you'd know that the then Gov, Matt Blunt called them out on their BS.

That means the State of Missouri had no investigations launched, Blunt squashed the BS that the JeffCo Sheriff and Stl county officals were spouting. No state investigations were conducted. So your 180 shot the ***k out on that score high speed.

Wrap yer tin foil tighter and dig yer bunker deeper there Slappy.

Cause that s**t was f***in weak!!!
 
George said:
That was Clinton's view, how'd that work out?
Click to expand...

For America or the rest of the world?

I'd really like to debate this in a measured fashion because it is such a complex and hot button subject.

As I see it terrorists commit acts of violence, coercion and intimidation against people and organisations - these acts are illegal in many countries and covered by standing laws.

The complication comes when gathering evidence and prosecuting these cases. For a terrorist case and even some criminal cases you do not want to disclose your source, but you must to ensure that the rule of law is adhered to, for all concerned!

Terrorists and criminals don't have to worry about standards and procedures - only results, but authorities must justify manpower expense, legal position and the fact that did not impinge on anyone elses rights, I guess it depends on how threatetned the public feels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top