silent driller
Active member
I'm kinda suprised not to have seen this yet, but here it is. I say Bush myself, but how bout y'all?
:shock: LOOK THE DOLLAR FALLING! I don't wanna see 500 billion dollar deficite in next few years................ I want sufficiteItalian Guy said:Bush. First, I would never vote for anyone supported by that jerk of Moore.
Secondly, I like George W.
GWB has done more for the military and for highlighting its role in America than 'veteran'-like Kerry has, who has in fact spitted on it.
Of course though I cant vote in the States.
Well, you probably saw how they "welcomed" him in Europe!(American flag with swastica! Personally I would shoot all those freaks carrying that!). And he isn't very bright man.................... :?Italian Guy said:I aint too much into economics, dude, but the buck dropping means way more export for the US, actually.
American economy is still growing in spite of a world scale crisis.
Employment might be growing slowly but Bush has to win. The world gotta see what the Americans are all about!!
Uncle_Sam said:They are both.................. We need another man in a wheel chair(Roosvelt)...................
Really, how do you explain him getting a C average at Harvard?Uncle_Sam said:...And he isn't very bright man...
RnderSafe said:Tell me, Uncle_Sam, since you support Kerry - what are his views? Which ones do you favor? Why do you think Kerry would be good for "industry," as you put it?
How do you think he will fare as President, when he hardly ever showed up to vote as a member of congress?
And for the link for my story: Whatch CNN at least 5 hours daily
I do not support either of them, they both, in my opinion, are not up for that job.RnderSafe said:Tell me, Uncle_Sam, since you support Kerry - what are his views? Which ones do you favour? Why do you think Kerry would be good for "industry," as you put it?
How do you think he will fare as President, when he hardly ever showed up to vote as a member of congress?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damien, it is not just CNN. All of the elite media stooges cover the war as they see fit - and they enjoy covering it with a negative spin. Reporters are doing shady things over there, and some of those things have gotten men killed - all so they could have a few mins of "action" on camera.
Red_Army said:As for John Kerry. His plans could get the US back on the right track. He promise to decrease American troops in Iraq, restore relationships with countries Bush alienated. Bring back jobs that went overseas during the reign of Bush, and reform medicare.
Red_Army said:For those who think George W. Bush is a good President, are you aware that he lost over 7 million jobs and regained only 6 million. Now, Bush is taking credit for the new jobs and say the ecomomy is booming. Yeah right!
http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2001/436/436p17.htmDoody said:as the economy goes, it started to tank under clinton
"Whether the US economy is plunging into a recession is the $64 million question of the day. Preliminary data for the December quarter suggests that US gross domestic product was growing at an annual rate of only 1.4% at the end of 2000, after slowing from 8.3% in the 1999 fourth quarter to 4.8%, 5.6% and 2.2% in each of the subsequent quarters.
Fears that the US economy was not headed into a period of slower growth — what official economists call a ``soft landing'' — but into a recession only really began to grip the capitalist class at the beginning of this year."
Bush took command in 2001 to an economy that was already on its way down. The bad thing for Bush is that the negative numbers finally came in under Bush's watch.
Check the numbers before saying Bush lead this country into a recession. Otherwise, you are making an empty claim
Doody said:Definately Bush. Yes I do have a few problems with Bush, but I shutter to think about Kerry getting elected. With Bush, you know exactly what he stands for. He is pretty concrete on most issues.
Kerry is something else. I cannot lay a finger on what exactly he stands for. Most of his campaign is based on general statements that offer no clear answer. Also, why is Kerry not talking about his voting record as a senator? He's been doing it for the last 20 years.
Lastly, has anyone heard Shawn Hanity interview Kerry supporters and ask them to name one issue stands for or one thing kerry's voted for in the senate. He did that a bunch of times on his radio show during the Republican Convention. The answers he got made me laugh my arse off. Basically people are voting for kerry because he's not Bush. Anywhere from 20-45% (depending on which poll you believe) of his support comes from those kind of people.
-------------------------------------------------
Red_Army said:For those who think George W. Bush is a good President, are you aware that he lost over 7 million jobs and regained only 6 million. Now, Bush is taking credit for the new jobs and say the ecomomy is booming. Yeah right!
Red_Army, I do not know where you get your news from, but your figures are WAY off. The actual numbers are between 1.8 and 2.2 million. Here's my news sources. Show me yours!!!!
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=nifea&&sid=aWCV_lbJDG9M
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/issues/campaign-2004-issues.htm
As for the economy being a mess when Bush took over. Read this from a post of mine:
http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2001/436/436p17.htmDoody said:as the economy goes, it started to tank under clinton
"Whether the US economy is plunging into a recession is the $64 million question of the day. Preliminary data for the December quarter suggests that US gross domestic product was growing at an annual rate of only 1.4% at the end of 2000, after slowing from 8.3% in the 1999 fourth quarter to 4.8%, 5.6% and 2.2% in each of the subsequent quarters.
Fears that the US economy was not headed into a period of slower growth — what official economists call a ``soft landing'' — but into a recession only really began to grip the capitalist class at the beginning of this year."
Bush took command in 2001 to an economy that was already on its way down. The bad thing for Bush is that the negative numbers finally came in under Bush's watch.
Check the numbers before saying Bush lead this country into a recession. Otherwise, you are making an empty claim
http://www.econedlink.org/lessons/index.cfm?lesson=EM225
http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2001/436/436p17.htm
I find it funny that I support my claims with non biased (I try to weed out the biased ones) sources while the claims of many Kerry supporters do not. News from moveon.org and kerryforpres.com do not count.
I am sick of the empty claims!!!!!