TESTIMONY OF GENERAL CARL E. MUNDY, JR.
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS, RETIRED
BEFORE THE HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
REGARDING REDESIGNATION OF THE POSITION OF THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY AS THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY AND THE MARINE CORPS
March 18, 2004
It's my privilege to come before this Committee to speak in support of your consideration of the proposal by Congressman Walter B. Jones to re-designate the position of Secretary of the Navy to Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.
In my judgment, this is an action that will accurately align the Secretary's title within his designated authority and responsibilities. The present title is confusing, represents only two-thirds of the uniformed service members in the Department, and is inconsistent with the status of the four Armed Services in the Department of Defense.
This proposal does not portend a change in the status of the Marine Corps within the Department. The status of the Corps, as a distinct Service, has evolved incrementally over many years through the actions of the Congress. Various pieces of long-standing legislation have effectively defined the Corps as an individual service within the Department of the Navy along with the U.S. Navy. More recently, there have been two important pieces of legislation. In 1980, the Congress formalized the status of the Commandant of the Marine Corps as a full member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Less than a decade later, the Goldwater-Nichols Act prescribed individual Service components, including the Marine Corps, within Unified Commands.
Thus, the status of the Marine Corps in the joint force organization and functioning of the Department of Defense is clear and operative. However, the titles "Department of the Navy" and "Secretary of the Navy" lead to some confusion in the public mind, as well as among civilian authorities and other Service members in both U.S. and allied defense establishments, and even in the ranks of the Navy and Marine Corps themselves from time to time as to the partnership of the Navy and Marine Corps within a common Department. Too often, a presumption is made that Marines are part of, or subordinate to the Navy.
I believe the changes proposed in H.R. 1741 will do much to clarify the relationship, responsibilities and functions of the appointed civilian authority over the United States Naval Services. Further, it will strengthen the understanding of the naval force structure within our defense establishment and the two Services that comprise it. Finally, I believe that any Secretary - present, or future - will be very proud to bear the title "Marine", as well as "Navy".
I thank you again for the opportunity to come before you, and will be pleased to respond to your questions.
Then in May, it was officially changed. This wasnt to seperate the two services but to acknowledge that the Marine Corps is a unit of its own within the Navy.