"Rights for the Rulers" Versus "Rights for Individuals"

Fair Tax Debunked...
http://www.factcheck.org/taxes/unspinning_the_fairtax.html


In a Nutshall: Read the whole Article for its conclusions, too long to post here:

1. 23% Sales Tax is deceptive because it is calculated on a "BEST CASE" scenario. A more realistic tax rate is about 30% and 34% "WORST" case.

2. That people making $15000-$200000 will be paying MORE in taxes while those making $200000 will pay CONSIDERABLY less. Figure 9.4
On average,the Middle class will see a 3-4% increase in what they pay while those making $200000 will see a 8% decrease.

3. Because Sales taxes are based on the Size of the economic, the sales taxes people pay will grow as the economy grows.

4. Sales taxes hurt the poor more than the rich, because they spend a higher percentage of their income on basic necessities, therefore they would be required to pay the percentage of sales tax as well.
 
Last edited:
Fair Tax Debunked...
http://www.factcheck.org/taxes/unspinning_the_fairtax.html


In a Nutshall: Read the whole Article for its conclusions, too long to post here:

1. 23% Sales Tax is deceptive because it is calculated on a "BEST CASE" scenario. A more realistic tax rate is about 30% and 34% "WORST" case.

2. That people making $15000-$200000 will be paying MORE in taxes while those making $200000 will pay CONSIDERABLY less. Figure 9.4
On average,the Middle class will see a 3-4% increase in what they pay while those making $200000 will see a 8% decrease.

3. Because Sales taxes are based on the Size of the economic, the sales taxes people pay will grow as the economy grows.

4. Sales taxes hurt the poor more than the rich, because they spend a higher percentage of their income on basic necessities, therefore they would be required to pay the percentage of sales tax as well.
Boortz could chew this up in no time. Federal govt purchases will go up because of the Tax. Say what? If charged, the Fed Govt would simply be paying it to itself= no increase in price. There is substantial tax burden hidden in prices. Competition would squeeze out the difference. Point #2 everyone pays the same rate= fair, progressive not fair. point #3 yeah, so? Point #4 Rich & poor pay = rate of State/local sales tax, @ least that's fair.
 
Fair Tax Debunked...
http://www.factcheck.org/taxes/unspinning_the_fairtax.html


In a Nutshall: Read the whole Article for its conclusions, too long to post here:
An interesting article and it appears that they are trying to be fair about it, but....

1. 23% Sales Tax is deceptive because it is calculated on a "BEST CASE" scenario. A more realistic tax rate is about 30% and 34% "WORST" case.
Whatever the rate is, it is based on what you buy. NEW goods and services. Some New stuff might be a bit more expensive, but the cost for necesities will be offset by the prebate.

2. That people making $15000-$200000 will be paying MORE in taxes while those making $200000 will pay CONSIDERABLY less. Figure 9.4
On average,the Middle class will see a 3-4% increase in what they pay while those making $200000 will see a 8% decrease.
I wonder if a lot of people have actually looked at their paystubs to see just HOW much they are paying. What the fair tax does is give the consumer CHOICE. Something that they do not have under the current system.

3. Because Sales taxes are based on the Size of the economic, the sales taxes people pay will grow as the economy grows.
This should encourage the government to think about the economy before it implements policy. Course they can always just borrow and spend.

4. Sales taxes hurt the poor more than the rich, because they spend a higher percentage of their income on basic necessities, therefore they would be required to pay the percentage of sales tax as well.
As a retort to your statement here (taken from the website cited above) I will include the rest of the analysis.
The FairTax plan, however, helps to alleviate this difficulty by exempting sales taxes on all income up to the poverty level. Taxpayers would receive a "prebate," which Edwards calculates to be about $5,600 annually. The Treasury Department estimates that the prebate program would cost between $600 billion and $700 billion annually, making it the largest category of federal spending. Americans for Fair Taxation disputes the Treasury Department numbers, claiming that the actual cost would be closer to $485 billion per year. The Treasury Department has so far refused to release its methodology, making it difficult to determine whose estimate is correct.
While there is some speculation about how much the prebate program will cost, it seems that since everyone who is here illegally will NOT be getting the prebate, they will be contributing but not getting some of the benefits.
 
HokieMSG

1. Actually if you look closely it says only those making less $24000 (with the prebate) and those making above $200000 would see any decrease. The Prebate only helps low income families, it does NOT offset the increase in taxes to the Middle Class who will be butt raped. The biggest losers will be you and me.

With the prebate program in effect, those earning less than $15,000 per year would see their share of the federal tax burden drop from -0.7 percent to -6.3 percent. Of course, if the poorest Americans are paying less under the FairTax plan, then someone else pays more. As it turns out, according to the Treasury Department, “someone else” is everybody earning between $15,000 and $200,000 per year

and if you look at the chart the degree we pay more climbs rapidly until you reach the magic $200,000.

The other problem with the prebates is that will create on of the biggest government programs the country has ever seen larger than even SS.

2. I don't think Americans really care about choice. When push comes to shove its all about how much they will pay at the end of the year. Honestly if you think Americans are going to chose pay more with a Sales tax and have very limited choice, then pay less and have none. Ill bet you the farm that they will chose the option that costs them the less money.

3. Wishfully thinking. I see absolutely I indication the government would ever do such a thing,

4. Already answered in Number #1. The prebate will only aid those making about $15000-$20000. It will not scale up enough to compensate the Middle Class, they will see their taxes grow, as per usual.

And more to the point, why do we need to change the system. Americans pay far less taxes than most western countries. You should see what western Europe has to pay, it will blow your socks off

The Top 12 highest and Lowest Tax Rates

http://www.businesspundit.com/12-countries-with-the-highest-lowest-tax-rates/

The USA is #2 on the LOWEST.

The United States is still relatively tax-friendly, with a marginal tax rate of around 27% on average income workers. As the world’s largest economy by far, the economic vitality and high standards of living in the U.S. speak for themselves. The United States boasts the 6th highest GPD per capita in the world at $47,440 and serves, in the words of Wikipedia, as “the epicenter of world trade.” Total GDP stood at over $14 trillion for 2008, which is more than three times that of the world’s second largest economy (Japan). American citizens also have the highest income per hour worked of any nation surveyed. By any objective measure, the United States and its relatively low tax rates offer the best of both worlds — reasonable social safety nets, and extraordinary economic capacity stemming from essentially free market policies. The standard of living in the US is evidenced by consistently being the most immigrated-to nation on earth — 38,355,000 immigrants currently call the US home, more than double that of Russia, which is second on the list.

You know the old saying: IF IT AIN'T BROKE DON'T FIX IT?.

To me the problem isn't that we pay unfair taxes, its that we get zilch for it. I don't demand to pay less taxes, I want better transparency of where the money is going.
 
Last edited:
2. I don't think Americans really care about choice. When push comes to shove its all about how much they will pay at the end of the year. Honestly if you think Americans are going to chose pay more with a Sales tax and have very limited choice, then pay less and have none. Ill bet you the farm that they will chose the option that costs them the less money.

The point I am trying to make here is that ALL Americans will get the prebate. Everyone can CHOOSE to get basic staples and will not see an increase in what they used to pay for food. If they decide to buy steak and lobster, they WILL see an increase. That is the point I was trying to make about choice.

Another point about choice. You don't want to pay the tax when you buy a car or a house, buy used. No tax there.

As to Item #4. The prebate and the added income from no withholding would enable the poor to save more, invest more and provide a better standard of living for their families.

I do not mind paying taxes as well, in addition to your transparency, I wish politicians could balance the budget. Before you say it. I know republicans didn't do it. It's Bush's fault, yada yada. Lets not kick THAT dead horse.

I think that one reason that Americans don't like taxes is because they are anathema to capitalism. This is something that Marx and Engels proposed back in 1848.

10 point program of Communism
  1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
  2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
  3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.
  4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
  5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
  6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
  7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
  8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
  9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country.
  10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.[8]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_manifesto
 
The point I am trying to make here is that ALL Americans will get the prebate. Everyone can CHOOSE to get basic staples and will not see an increase in what they used to pay for food. If they decide to buy steak and lobster, they WILL see an increase. That is the point I was trying to make about choice.

Another point about choice. You don't want to pay the tax when you buy a car or a house, buy used. No tax there.

As to Item #4. The prebate and the added income from no withholding would enable the poor to save more, invest more and provide a better standard of living for their families.

I do not mind paying taxes as well, in addition to your transparency, I wish politicians could balance the budget. Before you say it. I know republicans didn't do it. It's Bush's fault, yada yada. Lets not kick THAT dead horse.

I think that one reason that Americans don't like taxes is because they are anathema to capitalism. This is something that Marx and Engels proposed back in 1848.
Oh yes, because taxing the ever living $#%^ out of people who make less money and taxing the richest people LESS is TOTALLY a good idea.

Your lack of concern for anyone else astounds me.
 
The point I am trying to make here is that ALL Americans will get the prebate. Everyone can CHOOSE to get basic staples and will not see an increase in what they used to pay for food. If they decide to buy steak and lobster, they WILL see an increase. That is the point I was trying to make about choice.

Another point about choice. You don't want to pay the tax when you buy a car or a house, buy used. No tax there.

As to Item #4. The prebate and the added income from no withholding would enable the poor to save more, invest more and provide a better standard of living for their families.

I do not mind paying taxes as well, in addition to your transparency, I wish politicians could balance the budget. Before you say it. I know republicans didn't do it. It's Bush's fault, yada yada. Lets not kick THAT dead horse.

I think that one reason that Americans don't like taxes is because they are anathema to capitalism. This is something that Marx and Engels proposed back in 1848.
Reads like the Democrat Party plarform, but one Socialist or Communist said that back a few decades ago.
The US has lower tax burden that western Europe because we aren't as Socialized as Europe, something Obama plans to solve. Democrats want to add the V.A.T. to the existing taxes. The existing Tax Code is FUBAR now! Get the Fair Tax & watch the economy climb!
 
Correction: Get the Fair Tax & watch the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
How is everyone paying the same rate not fair? If the tax code wasn't a Liberal wetdream of ripping off the rich to fund the parasites, the stats about the rich's tax going down & the lower middle going up wouldn't be there. Go look @ the percentage of total tax the top 1%-5% actually pay.
 
Here's a question:
In our system, powerful individuals can buy politicians. These individuals are in many ways rulers in their own right. So where do we draw the line between an individual and a ruler if one can be both?
 
How is everyone paying the same rate not fair? If the tax code wasn't a Liberal wetdream of ripping off the rich to fund the parasites, the stats about the rich's tax going down & the lower middle going up wouldn't be there. Go look @ the percentage of total tax the top 1%-5% actually pay.

Its called the Golden Rule. "He who has the gold, makes the rules". A scaling tax system (the more you make the more taxes you pay) prevents our Democracy from becoming an Oligarchy like Russia was after communism fell.

It is designed to prevent a very select few from becoming the new robber barons who dominate everything.

And George there is a difference between what the rich pay (which is alot on paper) and what the actually pay (which is very little, sometimes nothing at all). How do they do this? Offshore Accounts, thousands of financial loopholes in the tax code that are exploited by world class lawyers that know every trick in the book.

Do you know what legal field is the most lucrative. Its not Corporate, or M&A or even Banking. The biggest cash-cow in the legal industry is TAX LAW, especially international tax law. I did several years the biggest law firms in the World, this is BIG business both for corporations and individual tax. Switzerland's economy revolves around banking, which in turn revolves around American+Europe richest people hiding their money their to avoid paying taxes.
 
Last edited:
Oh yes, because taxing the ever living $#%^ out of people who make less money and taxing the richest people LESS is TOTALLY a good idea.

Your lack of concern for anyone else astounds me.

I incorrectly referenced Chuckpike in this post. I sincerely apologize to Chuckpike. I meant to refer to Rob Henderson.

Rob Henderson, I expect better from you. My concern is for myself and my family. As to the fairtax "taxing the ever living $#%^ out of people who make less money and taxing the richest people LESS" (your words not mine) are not based in reality.
Some history here. I have an uncle who was born poor. He told his parents he wanted to go to college, they laughed at him. He did it anyway. Worked hard and is now very sucessful. I too funded my own way through college and am sucessful in my career.

My point is that just because you start poor, does not mean you have to STAY poor. You have to work hard, work smart and save.

I say this because too many poor people whine and complain that the government does nothing for them when they in fact have done nothing for themselves.

Rob Henderson, it sounds like you want everyone to carry last years tax return around with them and have them pay for things based on what they earned. You made 25K last year, I'm sorry the evil rich have exploited you, your loaf of bread is $.99. You made $100k last year, you must be evil and heartless and exploit the poor, your loaf of bread is $20.00.

Why punish someone who has had either good fortune or a good work ethic?

If you don't like being poor, study hard, work hard and get an education.

Irrespective of the economy, I have had a job since I was 16. I managed to put myself through college, while married with 2 children so don't tell me it cannot be done.

Bottom line is that wealth redistribution does NOT work.
 
Last edited:
Its called the Golden Rule. "He who has the gold, makes the rules". A scaling tax system (the more you make the more taxes you pay) prevents our Democracy from becoming an Oligarchy like Russia was after communism fell.

It is designed to prevent a very select few from becoming the new robber barons who dominate everything.

And George there is a difference between what the rich pay (which is alot on paper) and what the actually pay (which is very little, sometimes nothing at all). How do they do this? Offshore Accounts, thousands of financial loopholes in the tax code that are exploited by world class lawyers that know every trick in the book.

Do you know what legal field is the most lucrative. Its not Corporate, or M&A or even Banking. The biggest cash-cow in the legal industry is TAX LAW, especially international tax law. I did several years the biggest law firms in the World, this is BIG business both for corporations and individual tax. Switzerland's economy revolves around banking, which in turn revolves around American+Europe richest people hiding their money their to avoid paying taxes.
All because of the current Tax Codes! With the Fair Tax there are no loopholes, no write offs that shelter the rich & distort the economy. Tax lawyers would find employment in a real job, instead of the jungle created by other Lawyers. Every year just doing the paper work costs companys Billions, not to mention the time all of us lose, & the frustrations involved, with just filling out the forms. There would be no need for offshore accounts because there's no income tax. With no corporate taxes corporations would move here, instead of US companys moving overseas to avoid the taxes here.
 
All because of the current Tax Codes! With the Fair Tax there are no loopholes, no write offs that shelter the rich & distort the economy. Tax lawyers would find employment in a real job, instead of the jungle created by other Lawyers. Every year just doing the paper work costs companys Billions, not to mention the time all of us lose, & the frustrations involved, with just filling out the forms. There would be no need for offshore accounts because there's no income tax. With no corporate taxes corporations would move here, instead of US companys moving overseas to avoid the taxes here.

So then you agree that rich people are NOT paying their share correct? Good! we got that settled. And since we now agree that the rich do not actually pay what they are supposed to their is no sense making the system more tilted in their favor. Its like catching someone cheating on a test and the teacher deciding to make the test easier for the cheater.

Americans pay far lower taxes than most any western country, there is no problem with the system itself, only with those who cheat the system. These people need to be prosecuted.

HokieMSG

The problem with your scenario is because it worked for you it will automatically assume it works for everyone else. The trouble is society has been on a downward shift as of late and it is increasing more difficult to get ahead. Not only has the economic pie been gobbled by people at the top selfishly taking bigger and bigger pieces for themselves but it leaves fewer crumbs and with the population explosion you have more and more people fighting over whats left over.

I know of people working 3 jobs seven days a week and still cannot make ends meet. That scenario is FAR more common these days than the people who pulled themselves up by the bootstraps". Just look at the ever-increasing poverty in the USA

And you have another BIG advantage in America: you are white. Which helps a greater deal than you realize. Try being POOR, UNEDUCATED and URBAN BLACK or LATINO in America and see just how difficult it is to survive. Only a very lucky few urban black teens are able to escape poverty. Most people who sell drugs on the street or commit other crimes in the ghetto do so because they have very limited economic options not because they want to.
 
Last edited:
So then you agree that rich people are NOT paying their share correct? Good! we got that settled. And since we now agree that the rich do not actually pay what they are supposed to their is no sense making the system more tilted in their favor. Its like catching someone cheating on a test and the teacher deciding to make the test easier for the cheater.

Americans pay far lower taxes than most any western country, there is no problem with the system itself, only with those who cheat the system. These people need to be prosecuted.

HokieMSG

The problem with your scenario is because it worked for you it will automatically assume it works for everyone else. The trouble is society has been on a downward shift as of late and it is increasing more difficult to get ahead. Not only has the economic pie been gobbled by people at the top selfishly taking bigger and bigger pieces for themselves but it leaves fewer crumbs and with the population explosion you have more and more people fighting over whats left over.

I know of people working 3 jobs seven days a week and still cannot make ends meet. That scenario is FAR more common these days than the people who pulled themselves up by the bootstraps". Just look at the ever-increasing poverty in the USA

And you have another BIG advantage in America: you are white. Which helps a greater deal than you realize. Try being POOR, UNEDUCATED and URBAN BLACK or LATINO in America and see just how difficult it is to survive. Only a very lucky few urban black teens are able to escape poverty. Most people who sell drugs on the street or commit other crimes in the ghetto do so because they have very limited economic options not because they want to.
No, I was pointing out that his complaints are caused by the current train wreck of a tax code. They might be "Cheating the system" but only because of the nature of the system. No income tax, no need for stashing money.As far as fair the top 50% pays 97% of taxes payed, the top 1% pays 40% of all taxes payed! That doesn't sound like they're under taxed to me! Now...if they were paying 40% of all taxes payed because they were spending lots of money fine, but it's not right to punish them for makiing lots of money & rewarding slackers by making them pay a whopping 3% of taxes. Thats just Class Envy. removed
 
Last edited:
No, I was pointing out that his complaints are caused by the current train wreck of a tax code. They might be "Cheating the system" but only because of the nature of the system. No income tax, no need for stashing money.As far as fair the top 50% pays 97% of taxes payed, the top 1% pays 40% of all taxes payed! That doesn't sound like they're under taxed to me! Now...if they were paying 40% of all taxes payed because they were spending lots of money fine, but it's not right to punish them for makiing lots of money & rewarding slackers by making them pay a whopping 3% of taxes. Thats just Class Envy. Class Envy is tought to kids starting with stuff like Robin Hood, so it probably isn't your fault you haven't been able to progress past childhood fables.

"WE DON'T PAY TAXES, ONLY LITTLE PEOPLE PAY TAXES!" Thats a direct quote from Leona Helmsey, a NYC Real Estate Tycoon who did prison for cheating on her taxes.

That isn't the comment of someone who thinks its unfair, thats from someone that thinks the idea taxes are beneath her, and it is the common attitude of the majority of taxes cheats. They don't think its unfair, they are just GREEDY. Its simply a bunch of selfish individuals that think the idea of paying taxes is an anathema.

Do you whats more outrageous? Most of these tax cheats relied on government help early on in their business careers. Scholarships, Loans, Grants, tax credits, Deferrments, etc. This TAX money they took with no qualms, but they against the idea that they must pay back into the very system they took out of.

Do you know why its usually the rich who get caught as tax cheats? Its because everyone else cannot afford a Grade A+ $700 an hour tax lawyer and if we try and do what the wealthiest Americans are doing...we go to jail. You feel some sympathy for those actually caught breaking the law? I am sure most drug dealers think they shouldn't go to jail because the drug laws is unfair to them. Its the same logic, make the the system cater to those the most delinquent.

The rich in America ought to be grateful they only pay 30-40%. In Europe its 50%. And BTW the Europeans elites cheat on their taxes too for exactly the same reasons Americans do so once again.

Remember George these are the RICHEST Americans. They aren't exactly suffering, its not like the Government is stealing the caviar and Dom Parignon out of their mouths. Someone has got to pay those taxes and I'd rather it be those who CAN afford it rather than myself who CAN"T.

You ever wonder why those pushing for tax reforms in Washington are people like Forbes and Perot, people that would financially benefit the most? That must be a coincidence? Right?


And who said the tax system has to be fair? You want to talk about things unfair in America talk to people who have to live in a ghetto. They will give you the complete rundown of things unfair in America and you will be surprised that they don't have much sympathy for helping out millionaires.
 
Last edited:
"WE DON'T PAY TAXES, ONLY LITTLE PEOPLE PAY TAXES!" Thats a direct quote from Leona Helmsey, a NYC Real Estate Tycoon who did prison for cheating on her taxes.

That isn't the comment of someone who thinks its unfair, thats from someone that thinks the idea taxes are beneath her, and it is the common attitude of the majority of taxes cheats. They don't think its unfair, they are just GREEDY. Its simply a bunch of selfish individuals that think the idea of paying taxes is an anathema.

Do you whats more outrageous? Most of these tax cheats relied on government help early on in their business careers. Scholarships, Loans, Grants, tax credits, Deferrments, etc. This TAX money they took with no qualms, but they against the idea that they must pay back into the very system they took out of.

Do you know why its usually the rich who get caught as tax cheats? Its because everyone else cannot afford a Grade A+ $700 an hour tax lawyer and if we try and do what the wealthiest Americans are doing...we go to jail. You feel some sympathy for those actually caught breaking the law? I am sure most drug dealers think they shouldn't go to jail because the drug laws is unfair to them. Its the same logic, make the the system cater to those the most delinquent.

The rich in America ought to be grateful they only pay 30-40%. In Europe its 50%. And BTW the Europeans elites cheat on their taxes too for exactly the same reasons Americans do so once again.

Remember George these are the RICHEST Americans. They aren't exactly suffering, its not like the Government is stealing the caviar and Dom Parignon out of their mouths. Someone has got to pay those taxes and I'd rather it be those who CAN afford it rather than myself who CAN"T.

You ever wonder why those pushing for tax reforms in Washington are people like Forbes and Perot, people that would financially benefit the most? That must be a coincidence? Right?


And who said the tax system has to be fair? You want to talk about things unfair in America talk to people who have to live in a ghetto. They will give you the complete rundown of things unfair in America and you will be surprised that they don't have much sympathy for helping out millionaires.
Didn't say there weren't tax cheats & crooks. Elimination of income taxes ends one big area of cheating. People in all classes don't bother to pay back student loans, ect, but that's a diffrent subject. How is it Libs like the term "fair" when talking about the poor, but not the rich? Class envy again! As far as the ghetto is concerned Walter Williams pointed out in one of his newspaper articles that blacks were generally better off in the 50s with intact familys, ect than they are now after 60 years of Liberal social expierementing that has destroyed the familys, made them welfare dependant, crime running rampant with "Blame society instead of yourself, ect. If we had a flat income tax, say everybody pays 15%, the rich would still pay way more than the poor, but it would be a fair level playing field.
 
Last edited:
Didn't say there weren't tax cheats & crooks. Elimination of income taxes ends one big area of cheating. People in all classes don't bother to pay back student loans, ect, but that's a diffrent subject. How is it Libs like the term "fair" when talking about the poor, but not the rich? Class envy again! As far as the ghetto is concerned Walter Williams pointed out in one of his newspaper articles that blacks were generally better off in the 50s with intact familys, ect than they are now after 60 years of Liberal social expierementing that has destroyed the familys, made them welfare dependant, crime running rampant with "Blame society instead of yourself, ect. If we had a flat income tax, say everybody pays 15%, the rich would still pay way more than the poor, but it would be a fair level playing field.

This is my first post, so +1 Sir, everyone should pay the same percentage of their income in taxes. One thing that must be mentioned is that in the US, at least currently, one can have hope to pull themselves out of poverty, regardless of your station in life when born. Socialist countries you cannot. You are poor, you and your children will remain poor, no matter how successful you are. Those in Ghettos will always hate the wealthy, no matter who they are composed of, racially/ethnically. But ask them, do they want to remain poor or would they rather be wealthy? Individuals can pull themselves up, but with the Government wanting to, and looks to be succeeding, spreading the wealth, it only goes downward. The truly poor, who also make up those who don't work, receive the most. But strip me and others who do work of our savings, what do they really receive? The middle class isn't that rich. The truly wealthy remain so, the middle class disappears and now the vast majority are poor and without hope. Heck read what Karl Marx stated on what must happen before Communism can succeed. Middle class has got to go, the people must be made to realize the state is the provider of all, even if forced to do so. No nation has succeeded with socialism, except spreading destitution, poverty, and hopelessness. This is the same reason I believe in the right to keep and especially bear firearms. The Liberal believes that if all guns are outlawed everyone will be safe, same as if everyone has the same amount of money there will be no envy or strife. I on the other hand believe that if I have a firearm I can have the hope to protect my family and myself without relying on the state, same as I believe that even if I was born and raised in poverty, I can have the hope to one day be successful. Might not succeed but at least I had not only the hope but the chance to be successful. Or, if not me my children. I look at all the backgrounds of most Liberals and they come from wealth, never have had to struggle and believe the world is only waiting for them to take over and ensure those who were not born with a silver spoon are given that spoon from someone else. But, you know I notice they are not giving up their spoons. Have an area on the Tax Form where if you want you can give more of your income in taxes. Then we can see who walks the talk. Rome gave the masses bread, no matter if they worked or not. Something about giving people something without them having to work for it. They demand more and feel slighted when it is not provided. Nations who only remain in power by giving to those who don't have and now who will not work, fall.
 
This is my first post, so +1 Sir, everyone should pay the same percentage of their income in taxes. One thing that must be mentioned is that in the US, at least currently, one can have hope to pull themselves out of poverty, regardless of your station in life when born. Socialist countries you cannot. You are poor, you and your children will remain poor, no matter how successful you are. Those in Ghettos will always hate the wealthy, no matter who they are composed of, racially/ethnically. But ask them, do they want to remain poor or would they rather be wealthy? Individuals can pull themselves up, but with the Government wanting to, and looks to be succeeding, spreading the wealth, it only goes downward. The truly poor, who also make up those who don't work, receive the most. But strip me and others who do work of our savings, what do they really receive? The middle class isn't that rich. The truly wealthy remain so, the middle class disappears and now the vast majority are poor and without hope. Heck read what Karl Marx stated on what must happen before Communism can succeed. Middle class has got to go, the people must be made to realize the state is the provider of all, even if forced to do so. No nation has succeeded with socialism, except spreading destitution, poverty, and hopelessness. This is the same reason I believe in the right to keep and especially bear firearms. The Liberal believes that if all guns are outlawed everyone will be safe, same as if everyone has the same amount of money there will be no envy or strife. I on the other hand believe that if I have a firearm I can have the hope to protect my family and myself without relying on the state, same as I believe that even if I was born and raised in poverty, I can have the hope to one day be successful. Might not succeed but at least I had not only the hope but the chance to be successful. Or, if not me my children. I look at all the backgrounds of most Liberals and they come from wealth, never have had to struggle and believe the world is only waiting for them to take over and ensure those who were not born with a silver spoon are given that spoon from someone else. But, you know I notice they are not giving up their spoons. Have an area on the Tax Form where if you want you can give more of your income in taxes. Then we can see who walks the talk. Rome gave the masses bread, no matter if they worked or not. Something about giving people something without them having to work for it. They demand more and feel slighted when it is not provided. Nations who only remain in power by giving to those who don't have and now who will not work, fall.

I don't wish to be rude but you are talking out of your rear-end here. Lets just say that its obvious you have never lived abroad. I am an American have been living in France over a decade and I spend long periods of my time in other countries conducting business. I can tell you for a fact how much you are wrong from just about point A to point Z.

Socialism doesn't work? The Europeans would strongly disagree with you. I really wish people would try spending a few years living and working outside the USA before making such ignorant statements based on what other people have told them, not from what they have actually experienced. If socialism is really to blame for all economic woes, the perhaps you can explain why it was Capitalism that brought down the world economy last year? What about the Great Depression. So far Capitalism track record is not so hot. I can tell you for a fact, nobody is lining up to copy the US economic system.

All Liberals came from wealth? Obviously you have never met any. I lean liberal, I am from NYC, some liberals are wealthy, MOST are not. If most liberals came from money do you honestly think they'd care what you do? Personally, I would stay in my enclosed gated community sit back, and watch the conservatives screw over the country with another President Bush or a Palin. The reason I do care is that whenever the conservatives touch the economy they almost always make my situation worse. Want proof: When was the last time a GOP president presented a balanced Budget?

How would you like it if I said all conservatives are uneducated racist ignorant rednecks that date their sister. Are you going accept this as truth too?

All poor people are lazy, don't want to work. Again completely ignorant on the facts. Most poor people on welfare HAVE jobs. Some of them have 3 jobs seven days a week and are still poor. If you think welfare caters to the lazy you have never experienced it, there are easier ways to make money. And speaking about people not having jobs. The Teabaggers, do they have jobs? It sure doesn't seem so because they always seem to be spending their time at protests rather than being at work. For people who accuse other people of not working for a living, they might want to look in the mirror.

With all due respect, all you are doing is pushing ignorance and misinformed stereotypes as fact -sort of like what FOX NEWS does. Go see the world a bit then make your opinion.

George

You missed the point. Its not that there are tax cheats, is that there are a group of the wealthiest Americans who don't feel they have any obligation to pay, that taxes don't apply to them.Its more about EGO than MONEY. They have the capacity to pay, they just don't feel that they should. I watched Warren Buffet (one of the few exceptions to the above rule) argue Against the Bush Tax Cuts in 2001, saying that for him he wouldn't need the taxcut because for him even staying at the higher rate he still would have more money than he knew what to do with.

Helmsey was stupid enough to get caught, but she was far from the only one. These people rack up huge legal bills and pay political homage NOT to pay taxes. These people feel themselves as America's new nobility and the idea that they should have to pay taxes like the peasantry is something their egos won't take. You are doing their work for them.

People in all classes don't repay student loans? No George. Rich people don't have student loans, thats why they are "rich"! When you make $500,000+ a year, 25K a year isnt much of a bite. And perhaps you are aware of it but there are consequences for not paying off student loans. Your credit is f***ed for life, you will have credit agencies up the rear end who will make your life miserable, and eventually you will get sued by the creditor. Thats why almost all people pay off their loans.

Its not class envy, its class warfare. When 5% of US wage earners control 70% of all wealth in America I'd say there is quite a lot to be angry for the Poor and Middle Class who are now struggling. This also answers your second question. Why dont poor feel sorry for rich people? SORRY FOR WHAT? That they don't control 80% of US wealth? My heart bleeds. George I am neither greedy or egotistical. If I was in that 5% I would pay my 40% taxes and keep my mouth shut! I'm Middle Class, pay higher taxes than most Americans at the same income level and I am grateful for what I got. Thats exactly what the rich should think too.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top