Ohio Judge Pictured With Che and Obama Posterin Office

5.56X45mm

Milforum Mac Daddy
Ohio judge: State must change lethal injection law

ELYRIA, Ohio (AP) — A judge in Ohio says the state's method of putting prisoners to death is unconstitutional because two of three drugs used in the lethal injection process can cause pain.
Lorain County Common Pleas Judge James Burge said Tuesday the state's lethal injection procedure doesn't provide the quick and painless death required by Ohio law.
Burge said Ohio must stop allowing a combination of drugs and focus instead on a single, anesthetic drug.
The ruling is likely be appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.
Ohio has executed 26 inmates since it resumed putting prisoners to death in 1999.



burgex-large.jpg


http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-06-10-ohio-lethal-injection_N.htm?csp=34
Can someone tell me what the Irony Meter Reading is for a Judge to complain about the methods of legal execution while have a poster on the wall of a notorious executioner?

Oh, and before I forget. Didn't Obama get busted for one of his campaign offices in Texas having a Che Flag?

Seems like a communist, supporting another communist, that worships a communist.
 
Last edited:
So instead of actually debating the issue at hand.....you are questioning the judge's choice in posters?

And then, after attacking someone's poster choices, you somehow tie that into something you heard once about an Obama campaign office somewhere in Texas having a che flag? Seems logical and credible.


Wow.

I mean, I love reading your posts for their entertainment value 5.56, but this is just pushing the envelope of.....sense.
 
Last edited:
If the pain is the issue, let's just bring back the guillotine.
I think the point about the poster is not the poster itself but what it reflects about the owner.
Personally not a big fan of feel good neo-Taoist crap.
 
Communism... what's everyone's obsession with sh*t that's had so many opportunities to work and has failed with flying colors every time?
 
I'd say that even though it doesn't work for all the people, the people in charge love it as they are the only ones who seem to live in prosperity.
 
In most Communist movements, people like the guys who love to support it nowadays were usually the ones lined up along a ditch and shot.
 
And ironically the hippie MTV types who like to "reach out to the world" that tend to piss off those who live in far away places for being a bunch of valueless heathen who worship pornography. Until the GWOT that is.
It's so ironic.
 
The answer to your question 5.56, is that the world views Che as a resistance fighter not as a communist. And frankly today, hes more of a fashion statement than either of the above. People are uneducated in America
I bet a select few actually know who Che really was.

Aside from a Poster, there is nothing that suggests that the judge is a communist. I have a Hitler Youth knife on the wall, does displaying that automatically make me a Nazi?

And even if the judge is a communist, so what? This is America, you are allowed to be a communist.
 
You're right 5.56. That display of Che the communist next to Obama the wannbe President of the United States, isn't a good image. Che's very life was dedicated to the overthrow of all democratic forms of government and the institution of communist governments in their place. His remedy was always a world wide Marxist revolution. He opposed every form of capitalism. Despite the current commercialization of his own image, which I'm sure he would have condemned, his is still a despised memory of a violent man who promoted violence against the U.S. at every turn. He served as a henchman of Castro as they executed anyone they felt any suspicion against. At least to me it makes a difference how I view someone if they seemingly venerate such a character as Che. It's just my opinion but it is what it is.
 
Yes but lets be realistic here all the people who never going to vote for Obama see or want to see a significance everyone else couldn't care less.

So instead of actually debating the issue at hand.....you are questioning the judge's choice in posters?

And then, after attacking someone's poster choices, you somehow tie that into something you heard once about an Obama campaign office somewhere in Texas having a che flag? Seems logical and credible.


Wow.

I mean, I love reading your posts for their entertainment value 5.56, but this is just pushing the envelope of.....sense.

I think this is a very accurate assessment.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure it doesn't make any difference to some people, especially those who have no say in the U.S. election anyway. Those of us who like to try to gain an insight into the people who would occupy our highest elected office do care. This will merely be tallied up before we decide to cast our votes for one candidate or the other. The character of people who throw their support to one candidate or another does give a certain indication of the character of that candidate. At least that's how I see it.
 
So you are saying you determine the character of an individual by the type of poster that his image hangs next to on someone else's wall?
 
Well explain to me how you can get an insight into Barack Obama from a campaign poster hung on a wall next to a poster of Che Guevara which were more than likely not selected or hung by either of the individuals and were hung by someone that probably hasn't met either individual?

By all means read into what ever you like but please don't insult the intelligence of people by making unfounded assumptions as to a meaning hidden or not.
 
My interpretation of what the 1st Sgt was saying was that sometimes you can tell a persons character by who they vote for or you can sometimes get the character of a candidate by the types of folks voting for them.
 
If you're not going to carry on an intelligent discussion, I guess I'll leave you to whatever your version of reality might be. I have no time for an emotional, illogical joust. Good luck there!
 
My interpretation of what the 1st Sgt was saying was that sometimes you can tell a persons character by who they vote for or you can sometimes get the character of a candidate by the types of folks voting for them.

So if I put a picture of George Bush next to a picture of Adolf Hitler would you assume that I was a supporter of both or that Bush was a fascist dictator?

The argument has more holes in it than a soup strainer and nothing more than grasping at straws for reasons to dislike someone.

If you're not going to carry on an intelligent discussion, I guess I'll leave you to whatever your version of reality might be. I have no time for an emotional, illogical joust. Good luck there!

Odd I would be more inclined to say that if you can't back your argument with anything more than supposition and innuendo then chances are it wasn't a strong argument in the first place.
 
Last edited:
I think they key word is sometimes, not necessarily as a matter of fact, always. As I've said before here, two words that ought to not exist when discussing humans, always and never ought to not be used because it's rarely accurate unless we're talking all humans dying eventually of course. I think their is sound wisdom in what the 1st Sgt said, I agree with him.
 
Back
Top