![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
I think in a post-Korean war II situation, we'll really see the aftermaths of the works of evil up in North Korea.
Staff jockies always want to make things look as bad as possible so they get funding. If things are "fine and dandy," the first thing that'll happen is defense budget cuts. Also in simulations you want to run the worst case scenario. i.e. all the enemy's hardware runs, and it can run for a long time. |
![]() |
|
|
I dont know, this smells like a la drang valley november 1965 flashback to me when I read the article and on the same time look at other places on the Internet, TV, News papers and at western analys reports on the N.K strength on paper and assumed information.
They have been right on the Afghanistan, Iraq and probably on the Iran issue about strength on paper. Western N.K analysis I dont give a bottle of horse piss for to be honest in this special subject. People have lied before about wars and equipment of the enemys they are going to face. This one smells like a good reason for a lie to get the wheels rolling. I would still not be to surprised if you are right the_13th_redneck about the funding and the worst scenario simulations you are mentioning. Infact I belive or should I put it like this.. I really hope that you guys are right on this one. I think young soldiers are leaving us and their relatives far to soon allready in this middle east conflict in my humble opinion. They are doing a great job and protects not only Iraqi citizens side by side with Iraqi forces and allies but also the west. Who knows where in the world these street terrorists would be otherwise? Soldiers protect many things with their lifes down there without hesitation on there mission or their commander in chef. I only hope that whoever wins this election in U.S has a really good plan if there is a crisis that could mean U.S forces to the Gulf of Chili or Sea of Japan, because I am more concerned about N.K then I am of a possible operation against Iran where you almost can tell what the Iranian leaders have been eating for lunch by the foodstains on there clothes from sattelites around the globe, while we still dont know what caused a major explosion big as a smaller tactical atomic bomb in the N.K last month. I hope that South Korea and North Korea (the world leaders) can co exist without repeating the history and experiance another la drang valley scenario in a larger scale or eather worse another Hiroshima, Nagasaki but this time at our own backyards and this time with more players then N.K involved. Because my humble opinion is.. if one shoot, there will be more countries who follows and they will play along and make up some old scores and that includes countries that are our allies today. This is why I find this South vs North Korea so scarry. ![]() Best Regards: Doc.S ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Just in case you don't know:
China and N.Korea have a mutual defence help pact, if N.Korea is engaged in war, Chinese troops will be in, according to a Chinese article published today, if the war is in a limited scale, China will put in at least 400,000 troops/800 jets/180 navy ships to help N.Korea, if war goes out of hand, then China will put everything in. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
South Korea and the USA have a mutual defense pact as well. And of course there is the UN comission which is supposed to bring in additional UN forces if South Korea is attacked. Of course China could veto that now but I don't think that veto will make a difference.
Plus if you bring China into the war, it affects Japan's security so the Japanese Self Defense Force with its advanced weapons will be deploying full strength into the Yellow Sea. And then Russia might decide to support South Korea because it has important trade links with South Korea. So much business is done that in Busan, some bartenders can speak fluent Russian. Expect troops from the USA, Canada, UK and Japan to show up. |
![]() |