japanese writer suggests few ways to defend aginist china - Page 2




 
--
japanese writer suggests few ways to defend aginist china
 
May 1st, 2005  
MadeInChina
 
japanese writer suggests few ways to defend aginist china
yes temperaly, but not for long

china and unitedstates could never become long term allies

as demostrated, 2 superpowers cannot be allies

one tries to backstab another while the other thinks up of a plan to backstab the other
May 1st, 2005  
MadeInChina
 
yes temperaly, but not for long

china and unitedstates could never become long term allies

as demostrated, 2 superpowers cannot be allies

one tries to backstab another while the other thinks up of a plan to backstab the other
May 1st, 2005  
Whispering Death
 
 
China isn't a superpower.
--
japanese writer suggests few ways to defend aginist china
May 1st, 2005  
MontyB
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispering Death
China isn't a superpower.
Yet.

Quote:
Sounds like something you would hear back in the 1950's, during the cold war in my opinion. Don't you love propaganda and scare tactics?
Yep its the kind of paranoid thinking that leads to the creation of another cold war.

Unfortunately the guy that wrote it is somewhat prone to tunnel vision as he only see's the US and China as the two waring "superpowers" what he isnt looking at is the economic/military and population growth of areas such as India and European Union it is entirely possible that in the future the world will have multiple "superpowers" to offset any single agressive one.
May 1st, 2005  
rkmac48
 
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.


Another tragic lession in history - when a politician who has no inkling of military strategy tries to run the war effort, pandemonium ensues, sooner or later.

In this case, it ensued later; unfortunately, what was later to them is sooner to us. Now we have to deal with it.
May 2nd, 2005  
Arclight
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.
By attacking China on its mainland through MacArthur's strategy, I figure that would risk war with the Soviet Union as well.
May 2nd, 2005  
rkmac48
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.
By attacking China on its mainland through MacArthur's strategy, I figure that would risk war with the Soviet Union as well.

Could be. But if we, the free world, had gone to war with China, Russia, and North Korea, how many millions would have not been subjected to ruthless Communitst purges? It would have been the ultimate containment. Vietnam would not have occured... and the list goes on and on.

Feel free to check out my forum - www.journalofhistory.com - and join the online forum. It'd be great to have a new member and start a discussion on such a topic!
May 2nd, 2005  
Arclight
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.
By attacking China on its mainland through MacArthur's strategy, I figure that would risk war with the Soviet Union as well.

Could be. But if we, the free world, had gone to war with China, Russia, and North Korea, how many millions would have not been subjected to ruthless Communitst purges? It would have been the ultimate containment. Vietnam would not have occured... and the list goes on and on.
That is only if we could win. The Soviets could put up a good fight in Europe and the Chinese in Asia.
May 2nd, 2005  
EagleZtrike
 
 
China aint bent on world conquest.

If the US actually made an effort China could be a long term ally and good ones at that. They couldn't stay allied to Russia because they had a corrupt leader and a rebellious government/society.
May 2nd, 2005  
rkmac48
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arclight
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkmac48
The fact that we're even having to discuss this burns my butt big time. If Truman had allowed MacArthur to exercise his command of military strategy, communism would have been driven out of China by the point of a gun back in the 1950's.
By attacking China on its mainland through MacArthur's strategy, I figure that would risk war with the Soviet Union as well.

Could be. But if we, the free world, had gone to war with China, Russia, and North Korea, how many millions would have not been subjected to ruthless Communitst purges? It would have been the ultimate containment. Vietnam would not have occured... and the list goes on and on.
That is only if we could win. The Soviets could put up a good fight in Europe and the Chinese in Asia.
Yeah, but we had nukes. The soviets did too, thanks to the Rosenbergs... but we'd have wiped them out. The U.N. may actually have been useful back then - likely, it would have supported a massive effort to stop China and Company.