Israel compared to Saddam's regime; interesting - Page 3




 
--
 
April 21st, 2004  
hc^patonki
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkmb101
Well, first off the United States are currently fighting a war against terrorism. The same terrorists group of terrorists which attacked the World Trade Center. We knew Saddam had been training, suppling and paying for these terrorists.
How do you know Saddam was behind the strike against WTC, if I dont remember wrong George Bush also knew Saddam has chemical weapons etc.(but none of those were never found)
Wasnt the group which attacked WTC al-qaeda which is Osama bin-ladens group, and to my knowledge Osama also hates Saddam, so it is wrong to blame Saddam for that.
And IMO it dosent goes like that that some country is purely good or bad, but my opinion is that the both Israel and Iraq has done very bad things and if I have to decide they both are bad.
April 21st, 2004  
SHERMAN
 
 

Topic: well


This is off-topic.
April 21st, 2004  
Jtf2
 
Sherman thecnicly its not it kinda proves that this website is narrow minded.

Proof: good guys=isreal
bad guys= iraq..

Even if you are pro-isreal you cannot say bad guy there is no such thing.
Iraq didnt ask for a war.and isreal has killed way more people in 10 years then saddam has.(even under dif surcomstances)
--
April 21st, 2004  
Doppleganger
 
 
I think the difference between Israel and Iraq is that the Israelis are not, or haven't been, ruled by a sadistic tyrant (despite what some may think about Sharon) who brutually supresses any political opinion and murders his own people.

It's true that the Israelis are no angels and that they've rough-rodden over quite a few international laws themselves. But you cannot even begin to compare them to Saddam's regime.

Christos I understand what you're trying to demonstrate but if you really are trying to make a case for either saying there's no difference between Israel and Iraq or even saying that Israel is worse you're making yourself out to look either very biased or extremely foolish.
April 21st, 2004  
Jtf2
 
this whole website is bias lol
April 22nd, 2004  
Redneck
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jtf2
you cannot say bad guy there is no such thing.
Bullsh*t. So, to use the obvious example, Hitler was not a "bad guy?" Jeffrey Dahmer was not a "bad guy?" Usama bin Laden is not a "bad guy?"
That is, to be blunt, a trite and indefensible comment.

Quote:
this whole website is bias
"This whole website" is made up of over 650 members, each with different views. Even if the majority disagree with yourself, who's to say that it is not your own bias? Obviously everyone brings their own biases, no matter how small, based on their situation and experiences and beliefs, to any discussion, including yourself.
April 22nd, 2004  
soilder79936
 
 
didnt isreal mess with up after operation restoring hope
April 22nd, 2004  
Snauhi
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hc^patonki
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkmb101
Well, first off the United States are currently fighting a war against terrorism. The same terrorists group of terrorists which attacked the World Trade Center. We knew Saddam had been training, suppling and paying for these terrorists.
How do you know Saddam was behind the strike against WTC, if I dont remember wrong George Bush also knew Saddam has chemical weapons etc.(but none of those were never found)
Wasnt the group which attacked WTC al-qaeda which is Osama bin-ladens group, and to my knowledge Osama also hates Saddam, so it is wrong to blame Saddam for that.
:
yeah how do you know what saddam was behinde the attacks? yeah saddam was a tyran and hated USA, but i think he dint make any terrorist attacks agains USA and esspesaly WTC.
April 22nd, 2004  
Jtf2
 
Quote:
Quote:
this whole website is bias


"This whole website" is made up of over 650 members, each with different views. Even if the majority disagree with yourself, who's to say that it is not your own bias? Obviously everyone brings their own biases, no matter how small, based on their situation and experiences and beliefs, to any discussion, including yourself.
I agree im just saying if i were to post: May the republican guard get crushed no one would say anything against it and if i were to say may the US or isrealy troops suffer i would be banned.
(this is an example i do want anyone to die or suffer.)
April 22nd, 2004  
Redneck
 
 
These are assumptions, and I do not see what the point of even saying them is. If we banned people who did not agree with us (not that we always agree among ourselves, either), you'd already be gone, wouldn't you? Stay on topic.