OK Sir!I am sorry partner but you have yet to get your facts correct on history.
The Independence act stipulated that the six hundred princely state within the Indian Sub-Continent had a choice to join either India or Pakistan after signing the instrument of accenssion.Yes the demography pattern and geographical contiguity decided the majority of the issues.However the Nizam of Hyderabad and the ruler of Kashmir chose to abstain.
But still British suggested that muslim majority states go with Pakistan.
And population of Kashmir wanted to join Pakistan but the hindu leader wanted to join this region with India. This is a major fact that Indians don't want to recognize.
He was not making an early decision because he feared a revolt against him from Kashmiri locals. He was acting on the basis of self-interest and not for the interests of Kashmiri people.
The muslim majority was putting pressure on hindu leader to accede to Pakistan but he was not making any move. Rumours of muslim revolt against him started spreading in the region and for this reason Pakistan sent tribal militias in to the region. On seeing these developments he acceded the region to India and then fled to Dehli. This was an act of stupidity beyond normal person's understanding. This gave birth to the conflict.During October 1947 ,that is exactly after almost two months of creation of India and Pakistan the marauders from Pakistan,aided and abetted by the Pak Govt and its military arm were raiding the Kashmir valley in a surreptitious bid to wrench it for themselves.Its a matter of shame that the marauders themselves muslims did not spare the large muslim population of Kashmir from muder, mayhem and rape.Greed and avarice took priority over religious affinity and teachings.In a desperate bid the ruler of Kashmir acceded to the Indian Union and asked for its forces to come to the rescue of the local population.Paks oft repeated cliche on Islamic brother hood has often been proved otherwise on ground.
If he was so true then why did he fled to Dehli?
Kashmiri people would have fought by him and he could have waited for Indian response.
And your sources are dead wrong on our militias raping and pillaging any muslim in Kashmir. Most of the time they did not met any resistance from Kashmiri locals. It is a propaganda compaign of your media to defame our stand. Hindu property was indeed damaged by them!
Also I want to ask TWO questions?
1- Why their is no voilence in Azad Kashmir?
Those people are Kashmiri as well but they are very happy with us.
2- Why Kashmiri people in your side observe strikes and shut-down of businesses when your Military Day comes? Why they call it the Black Day?
Because they show the truth.
So get your facts straight as well!
Sir! their was lot more then that going on in that region. It is a separate and huge debate. Mukti Bahni movement was installed by some elements in Bengladesh to start freedom movement and this sparked voilence in that region and army had to make their move.In 1972 the Bengali muslim population of erstwhile East Pakistan rose in revolt against the genocide and torture their fellow brethren muslims from West Pakistan had perpetrated on them and thus was Bangladesh born.
But I agree that treatment of people by them was not good and we paid a price for that.
The muslims that migrated to Pakistan during partition days were treated like brothers and sisters here.The treatment meted out to expatriate muslims who had migrated to Pakistan from India and called Mujahirs is well known, they were treated as second class citizens, the Punjabis and Sindhis always did rule the roost in Pakistan.
Even my family migrated from Dehli to Pakistan and we are enjoying all benefits of life here.
What is your point?
Sir! your side of Kashmir is called occupied for a reason!India by article 370 of the Indian constitution has granted special status to Kashmir and no outsiders even from India are permitted to settle in this verdant valley so as to preserve the ethnicity of the Kashmiris and their life style.Whereas in Azad Kashmir or Pak occupied Kashmir once again the Punjabis and Sindhis have slowly moved in to establish their summer homes and promote their business and the demography is under a gradual change.
Our side of Kashmir is open for trade and businesses and development. Plus many people living their are ethnic Kashmiri. Punjabi prefer to live in Punjab and same is the case with Sindhi people. People live where their businesses are functioning and established.
You point here holds no ground as well.
Yes! you are absolutely true here!Finally the muslim population in India is by far larger than in Pakistan and the second largest in the world after
Indonesia.Our President is Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam who is a muslim and is one of the top scientist in the country.
No it does not!So my dear friend your so called logic of muslim dominated area etc falls on flat ground and the world better reconcile to it. :salute2:
Last edited: