^^^ You'r wrong ^^^
well debated
:roll:
i especially liked your referenced examples
Sure I do! :jump: a pro-Bush/pro-america Iranian in exile...
Just removed you from ignore list... back to ignore list now!
Well, people leave Iran all the time, word is they go to Iraq to fight the United States Military in many cases.
You try and tell Americans what Americans should be doing when it pertains to the United States of America, you try to tell Americans what to think when it comes to American Issues, and you are in my opinion, a Right Wing Extremist, so, you are in my opinion Anti-American, not "Pro-American".
You, in my opinion, view Freedom as what you would extend to people to do exactly what you want them to do, and to think the very same way you think.
Yes, dude! I am a neo-con... :jumproud of it! :-D
Bush rocks! ;-)
Iran proper has Neo-Cons in charge of the Governemnt of Iran right now correct? And President Bush did order the United States Military take out the long standing enemy of Iran (Saddam) did he not?
Iran proper is in the opinion of many (myself included) in a better position because of the US the war in Iraq right now, because of President Bush, so yes, I can see your point.
Moreover, you gotta play another card. Cuz what you doing now has no difference what what many law experts call "SLANDER"
So, you are going to sue me?
Well, if so, I look forward to seeing you in International Court, unless of course you are going to sue me in a U.S. Court, then I look forward to seeing you in a U.S. Court, are you going to tell the DoJ that you are a Bush Supporter and are therefore intitled?
SLANDER–noun 1.defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander. 2.a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name. 3.Law. defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc. –verb (used with object) 4.to utter slander against; defame. –verb (used without object) 5.to utter or circulate slander.Moreover, you gotta play another card. Cuz what you doing now has no difference what what many law experts call "SLANDER"
Back up your accusations or sod off plz!
:bang: :stupid: :bored:
Shouldn't you be in your bed now?
shouldn't you be debating like someone with a modicum of intelligence, or are you just going to resort to childish name calling?
if you cant back up your position with reasoning, well....doesn't leave much does it?
personally i'm interested to see what you definition of "freedom" actually is....but at the same time i dread your answer
I really think my time is too valueable to be wasted in debating with people who have no clue and have no interest or IQ to learn new stuff. They just say things against people out of their blind hatred.
My definition of freedom (philosophically):
It is the right or the capacity and ability, of self-determination as an expression of the individual or collective will.
I really think my time is too valueable to be wasted in debating with people who have no clue and have no interest or IQ to learn new stuff. They just say things against people out of their blind hatred.
I suppose you've been to Iraq? I suppose you've already read the Progress Report not due until August, that will ultimately informt he U.S. people if the troop increase has worked? When I was in country, I worked 4 days on, 1 day off. That means, I worked 4 days straight, usually with damn little, if any sleep. Now, the troops work one day on, one day off due to the troop surge. More troopers means more rest for each. We were severely overstretched. Personally, through my experiences, I honestly believe the troop surge was a smart move. If nothing else, more troops in combat means more combat vets. The knowledge that comes from each and every salty combat vet is invaluable. Right now, 75% of the Marine Corps has been to Iraq (and most have seen combat). That makes our military a force to be reckoned with, especially now.
If the United States has to fight another war, its not going to go like this one. The U.S. military is going to be even more efficient, and even more deadly as it is full of men and women who really know what they need to do because they've done it before. There's no way to train for war; however, war is pretty damn good training in itself.
I am really dreading the possibility that we will soon be witnessing another Vietnam ... the problem though, isn't the US Military (or) even the US Government, the problem is the very real FACT that the Iraqi Government itself, hasn't even half way met their OWN benchmarks ... and ... it is apparent they won't be able to prior to the August report (even with the US troop surge).
So the question is: WHAT DO WE DO WHEN THE AUGUST REPORT DISCLOSES THE IRAQI GOVERNMENT HASN'T LIVED UP TO THEIR OWN AGREEMENTS WITH THE US GOVERNMENT?
Some of the think tank Gurus, believe it will require another ten years of US troop involvement in Iraq before the Iraqi Government can fend for itself ... this is something the American people won't stand for ... they would be rise up and call for the impeachment of the government from the President on down.
IF the Gurus are right, then the only reasonable answer seems to be:
US troop withdrawal and let the Iraqi Government fend for itself (even if it means they fall).
Another ten years of American troops being targets for every terrorist organisation in the region ain't gonna happen.
Al-Maliki claims ‘full confidence’ if coalition forces withdraw ‘at any time’
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19760628/
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.