perseus
Active member
Why do we not view the native Indian extermination as an holocaust, because most of it is beyond living memory? Soon the horrors of Hilter and Stalin will also become beyond living memory, but no doubt they won't be pronounced as heroes. Perhaps the victors dictate who is in the right?
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/201...t-see/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email
In his book American Holocaust, the US scholar David Stannard documents the greatest acts of genocide the world has ever experienced(1). In 1492, some 100m native peoples lived in the Americas. By the end of the 19th Century almost all of them had been exterminated. Many died as a result of disease. But the mass extinction was also engineered.....
While the Spanish were mostly driven by the lust for gold, the British who colonised North America wanted land. In New England they surrounded the villages of the native Americans and murdered them as they slept. As genocide spread westwards, it was endorsed at the highest levels. George Washington ordered the total destruction of the homes and land of the Iroquois. Thomas Jefferson declared that his nation’s wars with the Indians should be pursued until each tribe “is exterminated or is driven beyond the Mississippi”. During the Sand Creek Massacre of 1864, troops in Colorado slaughtered unarmed people gathered under a flag of peace, killing children and babies, mutilating all the corpses and keeping their victims’ genitals to use as tobacco pouches or to wear on their hats. Theodore Roosevelt called this event “as rightful and beneficial a deed as ever took place on the frontier.”
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/201...t-see/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email
Last edited: