![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Quote:
This is a widespread but wrong assumption : more women were put to work in Germany than in Britain and the US . Order of rank : 1)SU 2) Germany 3) Britain 4) US |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Topic: In Military rolesQuote:
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
These are debunked by Overy and Tooze (The Wages of Destruction)
From Overy : % of women in the workforce Germany : 1939:37.4 1940: 41.4 1941: 42.6 1942: 46 1943: 48 1944: 51.6 Britain (same years): 26.4 26.4 29.8 33.2 36.1 37.7 US: 1940: 25?8 1941 : 26.6 1942: 28.8 1943 :34.2 1944: 35.7 Two other points : 1) the distinction between arms industry and civilian war work is something artificial : already in 1940 more than 50 % of the German workforce was working for the WM 2)Any article using Speer as a source should be discarded: there are a lot of proofs that he was an expert in lying. About the number of women in the armed forces : the figure of 500000 for Germany seems correct, but I am curious about sources for the numbers in the US and Britain .I doubt that there are any reliable sources for the number of 800000 in the SU . |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
Topic: clarityQuote:
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Lets face it during the war every one had to do some thing or other, even the Queen Elizabeth was driving trucks and is one of the few people in public office that had served in WW2. I will say that there was vast input by the women of the UK that kept the armed forces going.
In Germany Hitler was not worried to much about the German women working in factories when he had some eight million slaves from all over Europe forced to work in the factories |
![]() |