The build up to the Third World War

The unacknowledged economic depression of today will give way to the official beginning of the Third World War.


By Pablo Ouziel
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Perhaps a couple of decades from now we will all be praising the mainstream media for the wonderful work they have done reporting on our collective insanity. If we could all leave aside for a minute our nationalisms and ideologies, we could see through every page printed, every word aired, or every media image shown, that global confrontation is just around the corner. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]
The media seems to be seeing what its readers, viewers and listeners are not able to grasp. A large scale war is now unavoidable, and we have all contributed to it through our obtuse obsession with ourselves and our ideals, and our lack of holistic understanding of human interaction. That said, it could be that news are no longer news, and are just part of the 21st century satirical entertainment culture. [/FONT][FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]If that is the case, we can safely say that once the television is turned off, the war ends. [/FONT]

[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Week after week, escalation is the game being played by “our” governments. Every country flexing its muscle to see what it is able to obtain, as the cake of global resources is safely being distributed between those with access to the knife. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]The British fighting for the little bit of oil which they might be able to extract, if they push the boundaries of their empire past the legal 200 nautical miles from the shoreline of its colonized Ascension Island. The Americans pushing for their famous missile shield in the ex-soviet states, which for years now professor Chomsky has been labeling as a declaration of war. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]The Israelis focused on their territorial expansion on Palestinian land, through their now world-renowned settlements. The Russians with their personal conflict in Georgia, which the “international community” of hypocrites is unanimously condemning, with the same might as they unanimously support every aggression they personally wish to impart. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]
Literally every country in the world, no matter where we look, is bent on this culture of aggression. Nobody is able to trust anybody, because deep down we all know that we are selfish, and as soon as we can, we are going to do everything possible to get on top of the game. But the worse thing of all, is that we look at “our” countries as if they were people with a life of their own -- we talk about America as if it was a conquering woman, the pom-pom girl of world aggression, we look at Britain as the wise old fashioned conservative who thinks he knows everything, while Russia is the head of the Mafia and Israel the holder of the truth, the bearer of humanity’s suffering.
[/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]
Farcical stereotypes have been continuously set up by very effective spin-doctors with enough resources to govern the world. Put a barking dog behind a herd of sheep and they are bound to go in the direction you plan for them to follow. That is what we have today - barking dogs disguised as politicians, and sheep seeing themselves as citizens with a right to vote. The problem is that in this equation there is no shepherd to guide anyone to greener pastures. This is status quo necessary for those in power to remain in power, building fraudulent imagery about the true state of the world.
[/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]
It is this Status quo, which allows popular debate to remain framed in words like “hope” and “change” for Obama, as he sits in the foundations of corporate America, presenting his strategy for change, while demonstrators outside of Denver’s “freedom cage” are getting arrested. The same status quo, which constantly reminds us of McCain’s bravery as a POW, in a war which was unjustified and which killed many innocent Vietnamese civilians. The status quo, which allows for 90 Afghan civilians to be killed in one day by American troops, without a single minute of mourning by civilized Americans who claim to be helping them.
[/FONT]
<font face="verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><font size="2">In Spain, there is a saying which says, “no lo cogería ni con pinzas”, which translated to English could mean something like “I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole”, and sadly that is%2
 
Last edited:
"[FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif]-- Pablo Ouziel is a sociologist and freelance writer."

So he makes french fries for a living.
[/FONT]
 
Let me put it in a simpler way.
Globalization has made the world smaller in many respects. Also as you know, population is at an all time high. When you have a lot of people in a small space (remember space has many dimensions) you will have a fight. It's that simple.
What I read in your article is a lot of long winded bullsh*t.

Read on for more explanation but the above really sums it up:
The truth is, we need access to resources in order to maintain our way of life. People say that we should be "above" this but that is in fact horse sh*t. If you lose your access to key resources while the opposition gets it, not only do we have to trade in our cars and the like, but eventually our beliefs and freedoms as well. It's those things we take for granted that we fail to remember can be lost.
We'll probably see a lot of small wars, clandestine operations involving winning local governments (totally corrupt or a little less corrupt) and interesting government vs Corporation relationships but that's probably about it. I don't think we'll see huge World War II style wars.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top