Army Sets Iraq Troop Plans Through 2010




 
--
 
October 11th, 2006  
Easy-8
 
 

Topic: Army Sets Iraq Troop Plans Through 2010


Army Sets Iraq Troop Plans Through 2010
Associated Press | October 11, 2006

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Army has plans to keep the current level of soldiers in Iraq through 2010, the top Army officer said Wednesday, a later date than Bush administration or Pentagon officials have mentioned thus far.

The Army chief of staff, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, cautioned against reading too much into the planning, saying troops levels could be adjusted to actual conditions in Iraq. He said it is easier to hold back forces scheduled to go there than to prepare and deploy units at the last minute.
"This is not a prediction that things are going poorly or better," Schoomaker told reporters. "It's just that I have to have enough ammo in the magazine that I can continue to shoot as long as they want us to shoot."

Even so, his comments were the latest acknowledgment by Pentagon officials that a significant withdrawal of troops from Iraq is not likely in the immediate future.
Currently there are 141,000 troops in Iraq, including 120,000 Army soldiers. Those soldiers are divided among 15 Army combat brigades plus other support units.

Schoomaker's comments come less than four weeks before congressional elections, in which the unpopular war in Iraq and the Bush administration's policies there are a major campaign issue.

Last month, the top U.S. commander in the Middle East, Gen. John Abizaid, said the military would likely maintain or possibly even increase the current force levels through next spring.

In recent months the Army has shown signs of strain, as Pentagon officials have had to extend the Iraq deployments of two brigades in order to bolster security in Baghdad and allow units heading into the country to have at least one year at home before redeploying.

Schoomaker said he has received no new guidance from commanders in Iraq as to when the U.S. will be able to begin reducing the number of troops there. Last year officials had hoped to be down to about 100,000 by the end of this year, but escalating violence and sectarian tensions have prompted military leaders to increase forces.

He also said the Army will have to rely on the National Guard and Reserves to maintain the current level of deployments. When asked about concerns that reserve units are struggling to get the training and equipment they need before going back to Iraq, Schoomaker said that no troops would be sent into war without needed resources.

In separate remarks to reporters, Gen. Richard Cody, the Army vice chief of staff, said soldiers need more than 12 months between deployments to Iraq so they can do a full range of combat training and complete the kinds of educational programs that enable the Army to grow a fully mature officer corps.

"We need to reset the sergeants and send them to schools, the lieutenants and captains and send them off, so that we don't erode and become an Army that only can fight a counterinsurgency," Cody said. He added that North Korea's announced nuclear test "reminds us all that we may not just be in a counterinsurgency fight and we have to have full-spectrum capability."

Schoomaker spoke as the U.S. military death toll in Iraq rose to at least 2,750 since the war's start in March 2003. On Wednesday, the U.S. command said three U.S. Marines and two soldiers were killed in fighting there.

In another indication of the burden the Army expects to bear, Schoomaker said he believes the Army will need $138.8 billion (euro110.6 billion) in 2008, nearly $40 billion (euro31.8 billion) more than its planned expenditures for the 2007 budget year, which began Oct. 1. Schoomaker's proposed figure is nearly $25 billion (euro19.9 billion) more than the initial amount discussed by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

Schoomaker said the Army needs the money to modernize the force, continue needed research and development programs, and keep enough combat brigades in the field, while allowing adequate time for training and restoring equipment between deployments.

The Bush administration is likely to release its 2008 budget in February.

http://www.military.com/NewsContent/...116568,00.html
October 11th, 2006  
Team Infidel
 
 
well, we have to plan.. that's all this is... PLAN....
October 12th, 2006  
Rob Henderson
 
 
This may very well have set my future in the military. Dad told me he didnt want me to join.
--
October 12th, 2006  
Team Infidel
 
 
You need to do what you think is best for YOU. Join, don't join, but you make the decision.
October 12th, 2006  
bulldogg
 
 
Good advice TI.

Each generation has a price to pay for its freedom. You either help foot the bill or you let someone else foot it for you. Whichever one you choose, choose the one you can live with. I personally think national service should be mandatory, not necessarily military but national nonetheless. Our country is turning out wave upon wave of sycophantic lazy shiftless worthless coddled whinging little victims that need a serious dose of reality. I fear for the future of the US unless something drastic is done to pull the head out of the collective arse of this generation of PS3 knob jockeys and welfare hounds.
October 12th, 2006  
Damien435
 
 
Let's see, three years in Iraq vs. 55+ years in Korea, guess which one the media is up in arms about? Go ahead, guess.


Also, 60+ years in Japan, Germany and Italy, Phillipines more or less since the turn of the (19th) century. (except for a brief period during WWII) and we've been occupying the South since 1865.
October 12th, 2006  
Kirruth
 
 
It's not surprising they are planning a deployment through 2010. It's clear the current trend of violence and instability is in the wrong direction, and it will take at least that long before this eases up enough to consider withdrawing.

Let's hope it doesn't stop people joining the Military (if they otherwise would), or force people to join the Military (if they otherwise wouldn't)
October 12th, 2006  
Rob Henderson
 
 
^^^One can only hope.
 


Similar Topics
Army recalling 300 troops to Iraq who just arrived home in Alaska
Army chief tells Bush: there's not enough money for Iraq war
New Rules In Iraq May Make It Tougher To Keep Insurgents
Army making plans to be in Iraq thru 2009
Shaking hands with Sadam Hussein