Chief Bones, well, we can agree... We disagree on the value of a target like Osama...
And of course, I dont believe everything they serve us in the media... I honestly doubt that these mountain boys are "responsible"... I dont say they are innocent or nice people, but I believe that they are more an answer than a source...
And they are so so easy to replace... It takes incredible resources to kill one, and it takes just a few seconds to make a hundred.
Have you seen a shanty town in a third world country sir? I'm honestly amazed... by how kind a human being can be. If it was a person like me, who grew up with Disney product and the promise to be a prince living a comfortable... It would have destroyed the world for less humiliation than this.
And I'm honestly sick and tired of this cowboy BS. "you are against me or with me"... You want an honest answer?
I'm with you to the bone against terrorists. I want to exterminate every last one of them. But not the people labeled as terrorists, I mean the real terrorist.
Every scum bag using illegitimate force to get his egoist way.
But I dont agree on the method at all. I think that the use of violence against terrorism is a waste of resources. I would use violence in self defense. If a terrorist is running toward me with a bomb, I would scramble his brains with the bigger caliber available for sure.
But to make sure that he wont be replaced. Because that's the main problem. I would invest on a political/economic solution. Read above.
Poverty = desperate people
Unfair system = frustration
You mix these twos, and you get something very close to terrorism... The rest are just cultural variations.
And to be completely honest, I'm still in the "terrorist or freedom fighter" debate... Hate their methods, love their cause...
And sometimes, they are so so so underpowered compared to their foes that you do the mistake to excuse their methods... Then boom, you are an enemy sympathizer... then: GUILTY, HANG HIM!!! End of story...
But your "you are with me or against me" is too simple for this situation... I forgive you. Because when you have to deal with this crap first hand... You cant afford to not know if you are with friends or enemies.
So here is what I can tell you:
On the battlefield. I'm with you all the way. No questions asked.
But on the academic battlefield. In an university. When the guns are far away and that we are safe and supposed to face the ugly truth. You drop your "you are with me or against me". And I can side and support whoever I want... And not get persecuted ,whatever what I say. Means we can take a beer the same night without punching each others in the nose.
That's my definition of being civilized.
edit:
03USMC, come on, admit it. You would love that too.
Now, I know that I'm probably dreaming. I know that it wont happen.
But on the other hand, you are dreaming too when you think that you are going to destroy every terrorist on the planet by sending the cavalry...
War against terrorism is like using antibiotics against a common cold.
The more you use them, the stronger it gets. So you use higher doses... You kill your enemy, but it's replaced by nastier ones that spread faster. And at some point, you weaken the bodies of the people you are supposed to help... And then, they get sick and turn into carriers.
You can keep doing that. But at some point, you will lose the people who know how to make these antibiotics, and then, the method will fail for sure.
So unless you research bullets that kills only terrorists.... I think that my way is more realistic.