silent driller
Active member
Are you for it or against it? My contention is this:
During the weapons ban, a man can still get an automatic weapon on the black market. Now, when said man invades my house, all I have to defend myself with is a handgun or a shotgun. Maybe I will win the fight, but the man with the auto has the advantage.
After the weapons ban is lifted, that same man can still get his waepons off the black market(or a local gun show if he has no prior record), but I, the average citizen, can also get an automatic weapon(my weapon of choice would be the AR-10). Now, when this clown bursts through my door, I have homefield advantage and enought firepower to blast his sorry ass right back out the door.
I am personally glad the ban has ended.
During the weapons ban, a man can still get an automatic weapon on the black market. Now, when said man invades my house, all I have to defend myself with is a handgun or a shotgun. Maybe I will win the fight, but the man with the auto has the advantage.
After the weapons ban is lifted, that same man can still get his waepons off the black market(or a local gun show if he has no prior record), but I, the average citizen, can also get an automatic weapon(my weapon of choice would be the AR-10). Now, when this clown bursts through my door, I have homefield advantage and enought firepower to blast his sorry ass right back out the door.
I am personally glad the ban has ended.