Damien435
Active member
So I hopped on MilForums today and checked my control panel to see that I had the following message in my "reputation" area.
I want to know who the ****er is that wrote that, get rid of this anonymous reputation or just use your magic admin powers to tell me who wrote that. I don't give people reputations, I let my posts do my speaking for me, and furthermore I think this idea of reputation/karma/nods is retarded. But to call what I wrote a "Self-righteous rant, while being a hypocrite to boot. See post #47" is really out of place, here's what I said.
Which was in response to the following statement.
Which I was correct and being not at all self-righteous or hypocritical. Saddam did fire SCUDS are targets in Kuwait in 2003 after we started bombing Iraq for Round II and those weapons were banned by the truce (incorrectly labeled as "trust" in my actual post) following Desert Shield. You want self-righteous, I can give you self-righteous. You want hypocritical, I can give out hypocritical. You want a rant, I can post a rant. But in the meantime, I would like to suggest that this anonymous reputation BS be removed, I don't need to see a person's Reputation to know if they are full of BS or not just based on my experiences with them. This is the internet, it's already quite anonymous, that takes some special kind of chickenshit to be too scared to even call a spade a spade over 10,000 miles of cables and satellite signals. If you're going to give a person reps at least add your name to the comment box.
Self-righteous rant, while being a hypocrite to boot. See post #47
I want to know who the ****er is that wrote that, get rid of this anonymous reputation or just use your magic admin powers to tell me who wrote that. I don't give people reputations, I let my posts do my speaking for me, and furthermore I think this idea of reputation/karma/nods is retarded. But to call what I wrote a "Self-righteous rant, while being a hypocrite to boot. See post #47" is really out of place, here's what I said.
Those SCUDS that Saddam fired at Kuwait when we started dropping bombs in 2003 were banned following the trust in 1991. Just throwing it out there.
Which was in response to the following statement.
I think that once we started to invade, we should have figured out that they didn't exist.
If you're being invaded, and you had WMDs, woudn't you use them?
Which I was correct and being not at all self-righteous or hypocritical. Saddam did fire SCUDS are targets in Kuwait in 2003 after we started bombing Iraq for Round II and those weapons were banned by the truce (incorrectly labeled as "trust" in my actual post) following Desert Shield. You want self-righteous, I can give you self-righteous. You want hypocritical, I can give out hypocritical. You want a rant, I can post a rant. But in the meantime, I would like to suggest that this anonymous reputation BS be removed, I don't need to see a person's Reputation to know if they are full of BS or not just based on my experiences with them. This is the internet, it's already quite anonymous, that takes some special kind of chickenshit to be too scared to even call a spade a spade over 10,000 miles of cables and satellite signals. If you're going to give a person reps at least add your name to the comment box.