San Francisco 2016 Games bid in jeopardy

November 10th, 2006  
Team Infidel

Topic: San Francisco 2016 Games bid in jeopardy


Associated Press

COSTA MESA, Calif. - The untimely and unexpected scuttling of a San Francisco stadium project severely damaged that city's hopes of hosting the 2016 Olympics, while buoying the prospects for Los Angeles and Chicago.
"Not having an Olympic stadium is nonstarter No. 1," USOC international vice president Bob Ctvrtlik said Thursday at the close of the USOC's two-day seminar with the potential bid cities. "It's a very difficult hurdle to overcome."
Members of the San Francisco delegation acknowledged as much, saying they were stunned late Wednesday when they heard 49ers owner John York had called off negotiations with the city for a new stadium at Candlestick Point and was considering moving the team to Santa Clara. They said they were heading home to come up with a new location to hold opening and closing ceremonies and track and field.
"We'll look at any and all options," said Jesse Blout, San Francisco's director of economic development. "The mayor wants to win these Olympics."
In San Francisco, Mayor Gavin Newsom said he would contact USOC chairman Peter Ueberroth to discuss the developments.
Newsom, who in August said the city would abandon the bid if it "couldn't guarantee certain things," conceded York's announcement was not helpful to San Francisco's chances.
"That's a grand understatement," Newsom said.
The USOC wants to avoid a repeat of New York's failed 2012 Olympics bid. Financing for the New York stadium fell apart about a month before the final vote - a debacle that led to the city getting only 16 of the 60-or-so votes it needed and compelled the USOC to essentially take over the 2016 Games bid process.
San Francisco's loss only can help Los Angeles and Chicago, one of which likely will be the American candidate if the USOC decides in December to nominate a city. The candidates have to give a detailed presentation of their plan to the USOC by March 31. The USOC would choose its candidate in April.
The International Olympic Committee will select the host city in 2009.
Madrid, New Delhi, Prague, Rio de Janeiro, Rome and Tokyo are among the international cities that also have expressed interest in landing the 2016 Games.
Los Angeles is the only American candidate with a stadium in place. The host of the 1932 and 1984 Games would use a refurbished LA Coliseum. The extent of the restoration will depend in part on whether the NFL returns to Los Angeles.
The city also has permanent venues in place for every sport that needs them, save shooting. They propose using housing at UCLA and USC for the Olympic village. They believe the package they offer - with more venues in place and fewer financial questions - will outweigh concerns about bringing the Olympics back to Southern California for the third time.
"I don't see how any other city can beat what we have to offer," said Barry Sanders, chairman of the Los Angeles bid committee.
Chicago proposes building a new stadium in its Washington Park area, which would be the centerpiece of an Olympics that would be based around Lake Michigan and downtown. Chicago 2016 chairman Pat Ryan gave no specifics of how the privately financed venue would be paid for, other than to say the city would make the USOC feel comfortable about its plan.
"It's a process," Ryan said. "We're being very aggressive and diligent to give a measure of certainty."
That's more than San Francisco can say.
The news of York's decision broke only hours before Blout and his delegation were to meet with the USOC folks for a question-and-answer session on the details of the bid.
Not surprisingly, there wasn't much to talk about.
While refusing to say the city would withdraw from the process, Blout and Jaime Rupert, director of communications for the San Francisco bid, said that was an option. They gave every indication the news put the city's efforts on life support.
"If I'm in the USOC's position, I'm not seeing a lot of certainty in that situation," Blout conceded.
York was unapologetic about how his decision would affect the Olympic bid.
He said he repeatedly assured the mayor that any stadium the 49ers built in San Francisco could be used for the Olympics.
"Each one of those times, we kept reminding the mayor that this stadium was being built for our fans, for the players and coaches," York said.
The 49ers are considering moving to Santa Clara, and York said he would listen to proposals if the bid committee was interested in using the franchise's proposed new stadium there for the Olympics.
But there almost certainly won't be any assurances about that by the end of March, when the winning city's final plan must be in place.
The San Francisco bid committee is in scramble mode, and nobody denied that Thursday.
"Any time you get surprised by something like that, it's a little bit of a shock," Ctvrtlik said. "But we'll work together to find a solution. If it includes San Francisco going forward, that's great, and if it doesn't, then let's make that decision. But we need to know the real information."

Similar Topics
USOC expects to nominate a city for 2016
S.F. 49ers plan move to new Calif. city
Gun Ban in San Francisco Is Voided