same sex marriage (i am not gay) - Page 3




View Poll Results :wut do u think of same sex marriage
support it 13 37.14%
no 22 62.86%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

 
--
Boots
 
February 1st, 2005  
SwordFish_13
 
 
Hi,

Quote:
For one humongous reason, it spreads HIV.
Yes in the Begning Churches and religious institutes too said similar stuff and AIDS was considered GOD's warth on Homosexuals ...................But what they forget is Lesbians are at Minimal Risk on getting HIV ......... two sides of the Coin ..................And i don't think AIDS should be used to denounce Homosexuality ...........Everyone is At risk form Sexuality transmitted Disease be it Homo / Bi / hetro Sexuals.................to prevent them don't have sex at all PERIOD ..................

I don't care about one's sexual orientation ...................About Same sex marriage ................i think Civil Union with all the rights ........... is a better Option as marriage is somethign that has religion involved .


Quote:
can religion tolerate this?
NO ,.................and who cares State shoud be independent of religion.

peace
-=SF_13=-
February 1st, 2005  
A Can of Man
 
 
That's God telling us that he too enjoys having Lesbians around.
February 1st, 2005  
Charge 7
 
 
If HIV is the reasoning, then explain the reason it's running rampant in Africa. There goes that arguement into the wastebasket. People who have the idea that HIV is a homosexual issue are very dangerous. It allows the disease to spread because "it's a gay thing" whereas in actuality it's a threat to everybody.
--
Boots
February 1st, 2005  
Ed
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missileer
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHERMAN
I know im going to be sorrey for getting into this, but:

How dose it hurt everybody?
For one humongous reason, it spreads HIV. I know that isn't the only way that one can spread the disease but that has been determined to be the fastest way to spread it. I'll probably be annihilated for this but homosexuals tend to be more promiscuous than heterosexuals. Also, the first case recorded was a homosexual airline attendant. After exposure by homosexuality, HIV spreads quickly by bi-sexuals, needle users, blood transfusions, by birth Mother to child, and probably through ways yet to be discovered. Remember, HIV is not the only disease suffered by homosexuals but I'd rather not go into that.
How does letting Gays get married speed up the spread of HIV? They are still going to sleep together, regardless of their marital status(unprotected Hetrosexual sex spreads it to, gays are just less likely to use a condom). Also, If they are more promiscuous (and I agree with you on that), then wouldn't letting them settle down and have an official "Union" stop that?

However, I dont think it should be called "Marriage" when Gay people get married, while I am not religious this is a religious term and They should respect their rules that Gays cannot marry, The state can make gay 'Unions' legal though.

And really, What does it matter if there are two guys or a guy and a girl doing it next door, Its behind closed doors.
(and for the record, I am not Gay and I find two guys kissing rather unsettling)
February 1st, 2005  
A Can of Man
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charge_7
If HIV is the reasoning, then explain the reason it's running rampant in Africa. There goes that arguement into the wastebasket. People who have the idea that HIV is a homosexual issue are very dangerous. It allows the disease to spread because "it's a gay thing" whereas in actuality it's a threat to everybody.
I think it does tend to spread faster within a gay population but the statement suggests that it's a purely gay thing, which it is not.
The reason that it spreads faster in the gay community is that AIDS apparently spreads both ways when two people have **** sex. The chances of a guy getting AIDS from regular sex wtih a woman who has HIV is actually very slim. Also like I said from what I've seen from a year of being around a gay community, their attitudes towards sex are far more relaxed and multiple partner things aren't uncommon... as in they're far more common than heterosexual relationships. First of all, I think most of us can relate to how DIFFICULT it can be to get into a heterosexual relationship in the first place. Gays seem to have far less of this problem.

Either way it's a problem for everyone. Before people pull out the "God's way of disapproving gays," they should remember that God doesn't like stupid people either. And here on earth we are to treat all (well almost all lol) people well, and it's God's job to sort things out afterwards, not ours.
A bit like how it's the Mod's job to moderate, not ours. lol.

ADDED: And right, if those guys just get married... heck it might even just slow down the spread.
February 1st, 2005  
SHERMAN
 
 
Saying that it spreads AIDS is not true, since gay people will sleep with each other anyways. If they are married they are likely to be less actvie with other people, right?

and to Joe252, I suggest you think before you post.
February 1st, 2005  
Joe252
 
it was a JOKE....and HIV isnt just for homo's it is spreaded through rape by alot of people so i think
February 1st, 2005  
C/2nd Lt Robot
 
 
And by consent.
February 1st, 2005  
Pete031
 
 
I think if they want to be legally married then let them... I see no harm in it, but I think that being married by a church is something different... if you want to be married in a religious way then you have to abide by that religion. But if they want to be married by law then let them....
February 2nd, 2005  
Darkmb101
 
If we gave homosexual marriages a different name with the same benefits for some reason, I doubt this would be such a big deal.