Russia getting new equipment - Page 3




 
--
 
January 31st, 2005  
EuroSpike
 
"Just like you want to keep the Russians busy in economic mess, political mess and the countries around their borders. Why Russian president was very angry to U.S counter terror policy after the school terror attack? U.S uses different standards to deal with many issues over the world."

Russia's strongness causes nothing else than troubles to all countries it's nearby. That has been seen many times in history, latest time during cold war time. Who wants to return back?

Soviet Union has already collapsed to it's own impossiblity but somehow NATO and EU are still seen as enemies in Russia.

If russia gets new tanks to use, we should purchase new AT-weapons. Improved Apilas is already seeking for its replacer.
February 1st, 2005  
gingerbeard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charge_7
"Russia and china canít ignore Americanís aggressive expansion over the entire world"

Excuse me? Name one land we've added to our nation since 1898. I think the list for Russia nad China is _much_ more recent.
russia has, not china, china lost plenty of lands in the 20th century. as with tibet, it was chinese territory 200 years ago so that doesnt count. how about u try name some land china took in 20 century then.

US is certainly much more agressive than china in the 20th century, even in 19 century US is more aggressive than china, i do not know why people think china is an aggressive country, is this what ur education taught u?

as with US, well they are not adding lands, but just economically creating a certain "influence" like south korea, iraq.........

as with russia buying new equipment, its gd news for the russian, and i am sure russia still feel a certain degree of threat from US. since US has always wanted ot be a supremacy in the world (which country doesnt?) and no country would want another country to have supremacy over them.

i thought russian subs were pretty gd, some of the russian subs cannot be detected even with us equipment.

i am surprise the russian do have the cash to get new equipments, looks like china and india is making russia rich. but as russia get more advance, it will benefit both of those countries.
February 1st, 2005  
03USMC
 
 
The question was name one territory the US has aquired since 1898. You made the accusation now please provide the proof.

As far as our influence in South Korea, South Vietnam. Lets talk about North Korea, North Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Tibet, Monogolia?
--
February 1st, 2005  
gingerbeard
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03USMC
The question was name one territory the US has aquired since 1898. You made the accusation now please provide the proof.

As far as our influence in South Korea, South Vietnam. Lets talk about North Korea, North Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Tibet, Monogolia?
what about iraq? isreal? japan? taiwan? and parts of shanghai and some other parts of china too in 1898-1945. at least the chinese dun go and try to steal oil from a country than say another country is more aggressive.
i told u, tibet was a chinese territory 200 years ago, u r talking about after 1898, mongolia was also conqured about 200-300 years ago too. so u cannot count that in the equation.
is US which cause china to support North korea, so its US being aggresive first, so this doesnt count.
i do not know why malaysia will have influence from the chinese after 1898.
February 1st, 2005  
Sexybeast
 
en.....U.S got to give their land back to indians if they wanna chinese to leave tibet....

back to topic ppl:


the quantity of russian's new equipments being deployed is pretty small i think, not even over 100 t-90s right?
February 1st, 2005  
MadeInChina
 
fellow americans and western pros, please dont bring up the subject of imperalism in china and how much land you ahve taken from us, because i am really mad at this point of how you stated china took mor eland than the united states when in fact you powers took so much land from china that westarved while you enriched

please dont continue this subject, its called putting salt in old wounds
February 1st, 2005  
k19
 
They do "regime change"; itís less ďaggressiveĒ in their mind.
February 1st, 2005  
Charge 7
 
 
"as with tibet, it was chinese territory 200 years ago so that doesnt count."

Ah I see, so if you laid claim to them 200 years ago and they achieved INDEPENDANCE it doesn't mean a damn thing huh? Just okay to take it away from them right? And you wonder why we see you as aggressive?
February 1st, 2005  
A Can of Man
 
 
It's pointless.
February 1st, 2005  
03USMC
 
 
Roger That 13th . Can't argue with Peking.