Obama under pressure to release secret pages of 9/11 report 'showing Saudi Arabia Gov




 
--
Boots
 
June 6th, 2015  
ShahryarHedayatiSHBA
 
 

Topic: Obama under pressure to release secret pages of 9/11 report 'showing Saudi Arabia Gov


Obama under pressure to release secret pages of 9/11 report 'showing Saudi Arabia Government financed attacks'


A long running campaign over redacted pages of a Senate report into 9/11 which allegedly reveal Riyadh as the principle financier is gathering new momentum


The Obama administration is facing renewed pressure to release a top secret report that allegedly shows that Saudi Arabia directly helped to finance the September 11 attacks.

Rand Paul, the Libertarian Republican senator from Kentucky, is demanding that Mr Obama declassify 28 pages that were redacted from a 2002 US Senate report into the 9/11 attacks.

Mr Paul, who been vocal in attacking the bulk NSA spying programmes revealed by the rogue security contractor Edward Snowden and is running for president in 2016, has now promised to file an amendment to a Senate bill that would call on Mr Obama to declassify the pages.

According to Bob Graham, the former Florida senator who was chair of the Senate Intelligence committee at the time of the report, they show that Saudi Arabia government was the “principle financier” of the attack.

Some families of 9/11 victims have campaigned for several years for the declassification of the 28 pages, supported by Mr Graham who has now enlisted the high-profile Mr Paul to his cause.

“Information revealed over the years does raise questions about [Saudi Arabia’s] support, or whether their support might have been supportive to these Al Qaeda terrorists,” Mr Paul said at the press conference in Washington this week.

“We cannot let page after page of blanked-out documents be obscured behind a veil, leading these families to wonder if there is additional information surrounding these horrible acts.”

Fifteen of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, which killed 2,996 people. Many victims groups believe the full extent of Saudi involvement in 9/11 has long been covered up by both the Obama and Bush administrations to protect US-Saudi relations.

Terry Strada, who leads 9/11 Families and Survivors United For Justice Against Terrorism, said that the supposed Saudi funding link was not a surprise.

"Nearly every significant element that led to the attacks of Sept. 11 points to Saudi Arabia," he said. "Money is the lifeblood of terrorism. Without money, 9/11 wouldn’t have happened."

Earlier this year, the theory of Saudi involvement was given added impetus by fresh testimony from Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called "twentieth hijacker" who had taken flying lessons but was arrested weeks before the September 11 attacks – although was later disowned by Osama bin Laden.

In a plea to a New York court released last February, Moussaoui said that senior members of the Saudi royal family were major al-Qaeda donors and were intimately involved with Osama bin Laden's terror network in the 1990s.

He named Prince Turki al-Faisal, then the Saudi intelligence chief; Prince Bandar Bin Sultan, the longtime Saudi ambassador to the United States and Prince al-Waleed bin Talal, a prominent billionaire investor.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...medium=twitter
June 11th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Newspaper articles and allegations are not proofs,beside if it was true,it would not be in the interest of the US to make public the 28 pages .

And,of course it is not true: what would be the interest of SA to attack the US when the US were headed by the most pro Arab administration in a generation ?


Has nobody thought why Paul is now talking about 9/11? What will happen next year on the first Tuesdau after the first Monday of november ?

And Graham? Well,it is his last chance to have some publicity .
June 11th, 2015  
JOC
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
Newspaper articles and allegations are not proofs,beside if it was true,it would not be in the interest of the US to make public the 28 pages .

And,of course it is not true: what would be the interest of SA to attack the US when the US were headed by the most pro Arab administration in a generation ?
There is much merit in the previous statement!
--
Boots
June 12th, 2015  
Warwick
 
I thought everyone assumed that SA had backed the funding for the attacks....?
June 14th, 2015  
lljadw
 

About the credibility of Terry Strada : she gave a speech for the Schiller Institute,and,who do we find at the Schiller Institute ?

A lot of former inmates of the Fuller Institute of Massachusetts,as


Lyndon Larouche and our old friend Webster Tarpley,who said that Obama was a reactionairy run by David Rockefeller and that McKinley was murdered by MI 6.
June 14th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warwick
I thought everyone assumed that SA had backed the funding for the attacks....?
Everyone = Terry Strada
 


Similar Topics
Obama to cut short India trip to visit Saudi Arabia
Obama, world leaders head to Saudi Arabia to offer condolences
Obama to cut short India visit, fly to Saudi Arabia: sources
Obama seeks to reassure Saudi Arabia over Iran, Syria
Government Insider Says Bush ordered 9/11