Leopard 2 vs. Abrams - Page 2




View Poll Results :Leopard 2 vs. Abrams
Leopard 2 12 50.00%
Abrams 12 50.00%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

 
--
 
January 8th, 2006  
AlexKall
 
Guess this fits in here then: http://alexkall.shackspace.com/files/strv122.wmv

I will always go with Leopard 2 (in this round up) until the US forces come up with something new
January 9th, 2006  
FO Seaman
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexKall
Guess this fits in here then: http://alexkall.shackspace.com/files/strv122.wmv

I will always go with Leopard 2 (in this round up) until the US forces come up with something new
You'll be waiting a few years, the M1A2 is planned to be the U.S. Army's FCS until like 2020.
January 9th, 2006  
seth
 
I vote for Leopard 2.
They both have comparable performances in armor, armament, speed but Leo2 is more economic and have anti-mine protection.
--
January 9th, 2006  
AlexKall
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadet Seaman
You'll be waiting a few years, the M1A2 is planned to be the U.S. Army's FCS until like 2020.
Aww Well its a nice tank but i want to see something newer
January 10th, 2006  
Kozzy Mozzy
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexKall
Aww Well its a nice tank but i want to see something newer
the FCS wont be a tank in the conventional sense
January 10th, 2006  
godofthunder9010
 
 
Out of curiosity, doesn't the M1a2 still use M60's that require you to open the hatch and endanger crew members or have they gone with a coaxial now?
January 11th, 2006  
FO Seaman
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
Out of curiosity, doesn't the M1a2 still use M60's that require you to open the hatch and endanger crew members or have they gone with a coaxial now?
Huh?

The M1 in 1980 had a coaxial (M240), the loader uses an M240B and did for a short time use the M60D.

I think what your trying to get at is if the Army has installed a similiar system to CROWS for the loader. The coaxial or coax is the gun next to the main gun.
January 11th, 2006  
zander_0633
 
 
I will defitnely votet for Leo 2 cause there is news that a single RPG round can destroy a Abrams! In this case, it happened in Iraq!
January 11th, 2006  
godofthunder9010
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by zander_0633
I will defitnely votet for Leo 2 cause there is news that a single RPG round can destroy a Abrams! In this case, it happened in Iraq!
If its the right kind of RPG, a single round can destroy a Leo to, just to be fair. A single RPG can also knock out a Challenger II which is better protected that either of these.
January 11th, 2006  
godofthunder9010
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadet Seaman
Huh?

The M1 in 1980 had a coaxial (M240), the loader uses an M240B and did for a short time use the M60D.

I think what your trying to get at is if the Army has installed a similiar system to CROWS for the loader. The coaxial or coax is the gun next to the main gun.
Oops!