mmarsh
Active member
Time to play a little game.
I have been reading a book of submarine operations. In it the author mentions 2 known episodes of Submarines machine-gunning survivors after a sinking.
To avoid BIAS, I am purposely leaving out the Nationalities and any other relevant information. Both episodes are real and happened during WWII, and incidentally both Submarines were later sunk.
This is not trivial, I am just curious to see what people opinions are. If you know the incidents involved please do NOT post it. Ill give the answers at the end. The goal of this thread is to discuss whether this was a legitimate act of war or was a war crime.
The reason I ask this is I have a great uncle (now 84 years old, someone I am very close to) who was sunk by British Swordfish in WWII and then strafed by the RAF Bleinheim as he and his comrades were swimming in the water. He doesn't blame the British for the sinking (which may have a friendly fire accident or mistaken idenitity) but he has never forgiven them for machine-gunning them in the Med which killed his comrades in the water.
Scenario 1
A Submarine sinks 4 ships in a large convoy including a Troopship carrying an entire infantry division that is scheduled to participate in a landing. Because the ship carried the soldiers plus all their landing equipment (boats, landing craft, etc) the soldiers/sailors used these as makeshift lifeboats. The Submarine surfaces after the convoy has left and uses guns to destroy all the craft and and kill all survivors in the water. The number of enemy killed is unknown during this but probably high.
Scenario 2
In enemy waters where several friendly submarines have been sunk a Submarine Torpedoes a Merchant ship. Afraid that the wreckage would give away his position the Captain orders that all wreckage be sunk, including the full lifeboats, and wreckage survivors were clinging to. Its possible that the Captain did not purposely target the survivors specifically, but this is unimportant as there were no survivors from the ship. The captain later justified this action as necessary for the security of his boat.
I have been reading a book of submarine operations. In it the author mentions 2 known episodes of Submarines machine-gunning survivors after a sinking.
To avoid BIAS, I am purposely leaving out the Nationalities and any other relevant information. Both episodes are real and happened during WWII, and incidentally both Submarines were later sunk.
This is not trivial, I am just curious to see what people opinions are. If you know the incidents involved please do NOT post it. Ill give the answers at the end. The goal of this thread is to discuss whether this was a legitimate act of war or was a war crime.
The reason I ask this is I have a great uncle (now 84 years old, someone I am very close to) who was sunk by British Swordfish in WWII and then strafed by the RAF Bleinheim as he and his comrades were swimming in the water. He doesn't blame the British for the sinking (which may have a friendly fire accident or mistaken idenitity) but he has never forgiven them for machine-gunning them in the Med which killed his comrades in the water.
Scenario 1
A Submarine sinks 4 ships in a large convoy including a Troopship carrying an entire infantry division that is scheduled to participate in a landing. Because the ship carried the soldiers plus all their landing equipment (boats, landing craft, etc) the soldiers/sailors used these as makeshift lifeboats. The Submarine surfaces after the convoy has left and uses guns to destroy all the craft and and kill all survivors in the water. The number of enemy killed is unknown during this but probably high.
Scenario 2
In enemy waters where several friendly submarines have been sunk a Submarine Torpedoes a Merchant ship. Afraid that the wreckage would give away his position the Captain orders that all wreckage be sunk, including the full lifeboats, and wreckage survivors were clinging to. Its possible that the Captain did not purposely target the survivors specifically, but this is unimportant as there were no survivors from the ship. The captain later justified this action as necessary for the security of his boat.
Last edited: