Iran , Why ? - Page 7




 
--
Boots
 
March 7th, 2015  
tetvet
 
The U.S. is dealing from a position of immense strength they don't have to make any deals with anyone , no one , especially with the likes of Iran .
March 7th, 2015  
hamidreza
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tetvet
The U.S. is dealing from a position of immense strength they don't have to make any deals with anyone , no one , especially with the likes of Iran .
As I told before, The US doesn't dare attack Iran. If they could it is their first option!
March 7th, 2015  
Kesse81
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tetvet
The U.S. is dealing from a position of immense strength they don't have to make any deals with anyone , no one , especially with the likes of Iran .
A god way to piss of people!

Quote:
Originally Posted by hamidreza
As I told before, The US don't dare attack Iran. If they could it is their first option!
Rest assured the US has the balls to do so if they were forced to!
--
Boots
March 7th, 2015  
Yossarian
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tetvet
The U.S. is dealing from a position of immense strength they don't have to make any deals with anyone , no one , especially with the likes of Iran .

An Isolated strong discriminatory county is weaker than a coalition of many small weak countries.

You cut us off from the world with bigotry like that and you can eventual toss us into the trash heap of history.
March 7th, 2015  
hamidreza
 
40 years ago in these days Algeria president was interceding between Iran and Iraq on border issues and now after 40 years we are occupying Saddam birthplace, Tikrit.

March 7th, 2015  
hamidreza
 
Top US general optimistic about outcome of Tikrit battle

http://news.yahoo.com/top-us-general...-politics.html
March 7th, 2015  
MontyB
 
 
As Stalin said quantity has a quality of its own.

The problems will come once ISIL are defeated as a military force then it will go back to a bunch of terrorist groups while Sunni and Shia take to fighting each other again.
March 7th, 2015  
JOC
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamidreza
As I told before, The US doesn't dare attack Iran. If they could it is their first option!
There's a remote possibility that the US would as a last ditch effort take out Iran's nuclear faculties via bombers B1 and or B52's using bombs that no one else has. But the US has no interest in a land war with Iran. Yes it could, but no it won't. It doesn't make any sense for the US and nobody in the US is even advocating such a war.
March 7th, 2015  
lljadw
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOC
The Germans were terrified of the Red onslaught. The Reds killed ~ a million German civilians.


Stalin turned a blind eye to the this basically feeling they were getting what they deserved.


They murdered, raped and looted through out Germany's eastern provinces.
.
1)1 million is propaganda

2) Not correct : when Ehrenburg was inciting to kill all Germans,he was publicly debunked by Stalin .

3)This was only a small revenge for what the Germans had done .
March 7th, 2015  
JOC
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lljadw
1)1 million is propaganda

2) Not correct : when Ehrenburg was inciting to kill all Germans,he was publicly debunked by Stalin .

3)This was only a small revenge for what the Germans had done .
For one thing ~ 1 million (and it was higher >> 1.5 million, if we included civilians killed incidental to combat) in the Red army's taking the eastern provinces. Stalin and the leaders did turn a blind eye to the barbaric behavior of the Red army once they reached the German frontier. Although much of the loot was taken by the Red army for the Soviet Government as well, never to be returned. Yes seeing as the Germans were directly responsible for the deaths of at least 15 million Soviet civilians (depending on which historian you follow the number could be higher) it would seem a relatively small revenge. The Soviet atrocities in Germany were not planned state genocide, but more that of a vengeful opportunistic victorious army. Had you been a women or just a civilian in Germany facing the invading Red Army you didn't deserve the atrocities imposed on you anymore than the Soviets who suffered under the Nazi's. Stalin's own moto was death to the German invader. At wars end Stalin made effort to restore order to eastern Germany and banned any more such behavior. However directly after the war several million displaced Germans died of starvation, the elements, homelessness and such as they were forced out of Poland, Czechoslovakia, the Baltic States. Stalin was either directly or indirectly in control of these area's and did nothing to stop this tragety.
 


Similar Topics
De-Arabization of Iran
What If Iran Gets the Bomb? Good Analysis
'We've Got To Bring the Hammer Down on Iran'
Rice warns Iran of UN sanctions
Iran's Military