senojekips
Active member
Ghengis Khan, Stalin, Hitler all helped develop the world we know today, but I wouldn't want them to be looking after my interests.And yet they helped create the world we know and love today.
Ghengis Khan, Stalin, Hitler all helped develop the world we know today, but I wouldn't want them to be looking after my interests.And yet they helped create the world we know and love today.
Excuse me? My visit to UK left me with an impression that white Brits are a bunch of racist twats, my personal opinion about Brits as a nation is that they're a bunch of bigoted racist morons (its a huge generalisation) and opinions of people like LeeEnfield justify my point of view.
Twats like that never even think that there might be other people with other point of view like say, Indians who didnt give a f*ck about the Commonwealth in all its racist glory and definitely didnt want to starve for it.
Say what you like i dont give a flying crap about the anglosaxon world, it never did anything for me, my nation and given its long history of racism, immoral pragmatism in politics et cetera it can go burn in hell.
Not to turn it into a flamewar just to point out that UK had a racist policy and Churchill was nothing short of a racist murderer or we could roll with Senojekips and say he was an inconsiderate murderer.
As for the Commonwealth, its hated in India, good relations are a myth, UK has a long history of f*cking its associates within the empire tho, Gallipoli is one example, starving of India another.
That would depend on your disposition wouldn't it?
A sizable proportion of the Commonwealth is made up of third world, impoverish and corrupt nations, I can't think of a nation in Africa I would hold up as a shining example of success, the same could be said of Britain's Middle Eastern possessions and outside of Singapore Asia is pretty sparse on glowing examples.
Basically if not for Australia, Canada and New Zealand the commonwealth has been a royal failure, just a bunch of impoverish nations clinging to a failed empire.
As far as Churchill goes I think Senojekips is being rather polite.
Ghengis Khan, Stalin, Hitler all helped develop the world we know today, but I wouldn't want them to be looking after my interests.
That does not even enter the equation, firstly, I'm not so sure that your statement is even vaguely true. I feel that if there were no evil it would have a far better chance of having been a much better world.But would you want it to be different? Sometimes evil is a necessity to make a better world. You can't make a better world with no evil to fight.
The shaping of New Zealand was hardly attributable to Winston Churchill. You seem to be going off at a tangent that has little or nothing to do with the subject of the thread.And yet the nation you live and would fight for today was shaped by Britain.
Secondly it is something over which, neither I nor anybody else has any control. After all, I was merely putting forward my views of Winston Churchill and used Stalin et al, to show that people who shape history do not necessarily have to be good people.
And I simply stated that whether he was cruel or not, which I don't really care about to be frank, he did help shape the world today that frankly we love. Sure it's not perfect but has the world ever been? And in just stating a reasonably true statement I was shot down in flames.
I don't expect the world to be perfect, but I don't like to see any more undue suffering than is absolutely necessary either.And I simply stated that whether he was cruel or not, which I don't really care about to be frank, he did help shape the world today that frankly we love. Sure it's not perfect but has the world ever been? And in just stating a reasonably true statement I was shot down in flames.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.