Of the other commanders you mentioned, I would personally discount Kleist (the others are good choices though). It took him a long time to fully realize the possibilities of armour and his performances in France and initially in Russia were not outstanding. Coming back to Guderian bear in mind that he also:
a) was instrumental in creating the panzerwaffe and the tactics used by the German Army in WW2
b) had a major role in the 'Manstein Plan' and also was at the heart of the German successes in France
c) along with Speer made a major difference in AFV development and production 1943 onwards
d) had a hand in major strategy on the Ostfront although severely hampered by Hitler in this regard
So yes Guderian is famous but he does deserve that fame. Commanders like Balck, Hoth, Manteuffel, Hausser, Rommel and Manstein would have been different men without Guderian's influence.
There is never only 'one' man who advocates anything. There are a slew of others who are left in the background for one reason or another. The tactics used by the Wehrmacht in WWII were lacking, their initial victories owed more to numerical advantages and luck than anything else. As for his role in the French campaign, point out one panzer division commander who didn't do a good job? France's defeat was simply brought to a close faster due to their, Rommel's and Guderian's, reckless flights into the French rear without any regard for their flanks. Most commanders were hampered by Hitler and he wasn't the only one who had ideas about what to do on the Eastern Front, the focus is simply drawn to him for a variety of reasons and misses out on many others.