Panzercracker
Active member
So you're contesting valid sources with "i dont believe them" and "thats not true!!!11"? :lol:
Yes Specnaz brought tanks and IFVs, independent investigation provided proof of heavy weapons fire and yes tanks did fire at the school:
http://www.siberianlight.net/fsb-tanks-fired-on-beslan-school/
Or did you not know that Specnaz has tanks under its command and that even counter-terrorists use regular military assets?
More sources about tanks firing into the school:
http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/beslan_siege.html
Ministry troops were also engaged, as were helicopter gunships (including Mi-24 Hinds and Mi-8 Hips) and at least one tank (most probably two T-72s and one either T-80 or T-90) as well as several BTR armoured personnel carriers. Many local civilians also joined in the battle, having brought along their own weapons. Afterwards, the Russian government defended the use of tanks and other heavy weaponry, arguing that it was used after surviving hostages escaped from the school.
You still have only empty claims as opposed to my sources, can you or can you not prove any of your wild claims with anything else but your own opinion?
http://www.pravdabeslana.ru/shmel.htm
Flamethrowers used by FSB troops (the most elite troops in the Russian army) against the school.
Up until "Novaya Gazeta" passed the discovered flame throwers to the parliamentary commission on investigation of the terrorist act in Beslan, the Office of Public Prosecutor insisted that flame throwers were not used. Then the Prosecutor has admitted that they were used but declared that the school did not burn down because of them. They are trying to convince us that flame throwers kill only terrorists, not hostages.
Are you going to ridicule those too or are you finally going to back up your made up stories with anything more tangible then wiki which you likely edit yourself?
So KJ are you still defending the skillfull way Specnaz fried and shot the hostages or are those sources also wrong because you think they are?
Yes Specnaz brought tanks and IFVs, independent investigation provided proof of heavy weapons fire and yes tanks did fire at the school:
http://www.siberianlight.net/fsb-tanks-fired-on-beslan-school/
Or did you not know that Specnaz has tanks under its command and that even counter-terrorists use regular military assets?
More sources about tanks firing into the school:
http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/beslan_siege.html
Ministry troops were also engaged, as were helicopter gunships (including Mi-24 Hinds and Mi-8 Hips) and at least one tank (most probably two T-72s and one either T-80 or T-90) as well as several BTR armoured personnel carriers. Many local civilians also joined in the battle, having brought along their own weapons. Afterwards, the Russian government defended the use of tanks and other heavy weaponry, arguing that it was used after surviving hostages escaped from the school.
You still have only empty claims as opposed to my sources, can you or can you not prove any of your wild claims with anything else but your own opinion?
http://www.pravdabeslana.ru/shmel.htm
Flamethrowers used by FSB troops (the most elite troops in the Russian army) against the school.
Up until "Novaya Gazeta" passed the discovered flame throwers to the parliamentary commission on investigation of the terrorist act in Beslan, the Office of Public Prosecutor insisted that flame throwers were not used. Then the Prosecutor has admitted that they were used but declared that the school did not burn down because of them. They are trying to convince us that flame throwers kill only terrorists, not hostages.
Are you going to ridicule those too or are you finally going to back up your made up stories with anything more tangible then wiki which you likely edit yourself?
So KJ are you still defending the skillfull way Specnaz fried and shot the hostages or are those sources also wrong because you think they are?
Last edited: